Suppr超能文献

体外光化学疗法用单核细胞采集:自动与半自动血细胞分离仪的比较研究。

Mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photochemotherapy: a study comparing an automatic and a semiautomatic apheresis device.

机构信息

Immunohaematology and Transfusion Service, Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit and Scientific Direction, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2013 Sep;53(9):2027-33. doi: 10.1111/trf.12065. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is an effective cell therapy employed in several diseases, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and organ rejection after transplantation. When ECP is performed using the off-line technique, mononuclear cell (MNC) collection by leukapheresis is necessary for further manipulation. Semiautomated apheresis systems require experienced personnel to obtain a good MNC collection; an automated device, able to efficiently collect MNCs with high purity, is desirable. We compared the semiautomated COBE Spectra MNC and the new automated Spectra Optia v.5.0 MNC (Terumo BCT) devices in terms of efficacy and safety.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Adult patients with GVHD or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplant undergoing ECP at our center were alternatively assigned, within the same ECP cycle (composed by two procedures each), to MNC collection with either device. Patients' characteristics, procedure, and product-related variables were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (24 with GVHD and 15 with BOS) underwent a total of 126 ECP procedures, with good compliance to both devices. Product volume and platelet (PLT) and red blood cell contamination were significantly lower with the Spectra Optia. MNC collection efficiency (CE), purity, and PLT loss were similar between the two devices, while white blood cells CE was in favor of the COBE Spectra.

CONCLUSION

The Spectra Optia device proved to be a good option for MNC collection in the difficult ECP setting, since it ensures high-quality MNC collection, while at the same time saving personnel's time, guaranteeing optimal monitoring and care to this frail patient population.

摘要

背景

体外光化学疗法(ECP)是一种有效的细胞疗法,用于多种疾病,包括移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)和移植后器官排斥。当使用离线技术进行 ECP 时,需要通过白细胞分离术收集单核细胞(MNC)以进行进一步操作。半自动血浆分离系统需要有经验的人员来获得良好的 MNC 采集;需要一种能够高效采集高纯度 MNC 的自动化设备。我们比较了半自动 COBE Spectra MNC 和新型自动化 Spectra Optia v.5.0 MNC(Terumo BCT)设备在疗效和安全性方面的差异。

研究设计和方法

在我们中心接受 ECP 治疗的 GVHD 或肺移植后细支气管炎闭塞综合征(BOS)的成年患者,在同一 ECP 周期(由两次程序组成)内,交替使用这两种设备进行 MNC 采集。比较患者的特征、程序和产品相关变量。

结果

39 名患者(24 名 GVHD 和 15 名 BOS)共进行了 126 次 ECP 程序,两种设备均有良好的依从性。Spectra Optia 的产品体积、血小板(PLT)和红细胞污染显著较低。两种设备的 MNC 采集效率(CE)、纯度和 PLT 损失相似,而白细胞 CE 有利于 COBE Spectra。

结论

Spectra Optia 设备在困难的 ECP 环境中证明是 MNC 采集的一个不错的选择,因为它确保了高质量的 MNC 采集,同时节省了人员的时间,为这一脆弱的患者群体提供了最佳的监测和护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验