Suppr超能文献

组织型纤溶酶原激活剂超说明书治疗脑卒中的安全性。

Safety of off-label stroke treatment with tissue plasminogen activator.

机构信息

Centre for Neurovascular Diseases, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2013 Jul;128(1):48-53. doi: 10.1111/ane.12076. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients with acute ischaemic stroke do not receive intravenous thrombolysis due to contraindications. We aimed to assess safety, short-term clinical development, short-term outcome and mortality in patients treated off-label with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA).

METHODS

Stroke patients treated with tPA within 4.5 h after symptom onset during 2006-2011 were prospectively included. Patients with contraindications to tPA according to national guidelines were compared to patients without any of these contraindications. Separate analyses were performed on patients who had compatible contraindications and did not receive tPA. Primary outcome was rate of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (SICH). Secondary outcomes were short-term clinical development, short-term outcome and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 265 patients who received tPA, 135 patients (50.9%) had formal contraindications and 130 patients (49.1%) had no such contraindications. Rates of SICH were similar for patients with or without contraindications (P = 0.305). Patients with contraindications to tPA had a similar rate of clinical improvement (P = 0.504), a trend of less favourable outcome (P = 0.052) and higher mortality (P = 0.005) than patients without contraindications. Logistic regression analysis showed no association between presence of contraindications to tPA and short-term outcome or mortality when adjusted for age, sex and admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score. Short-term outcome and mortality were similar in patients with contraindications who received tPA and patients with contraindications who did not receive tPA (n = 134).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous thrombolysis with tPA may be safe and efficient in stroke patients with a number of formal contraindications to tPA. Prospective randomized trials are imperative to clarify the need for a re-evaluation of the current contraindications to tPA.

摘要

背景

许多急性缺血性脑卒中患者由于禁忌证而未接受静脉溶栓治疗。我们旨在评估在症状发作后 4.5 小时内使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)进行治疗的患者的安全性、短期临床进展、短期结局和死亡率。

方法

前瞻性纳入 2006 年至 2011 年期间在症状发作后 4.5 小时内接受 tPA 治疗的脑卒中患者。根据国家指南,将有 tPA 禁忌证的患者与无任何禁忌证的患者进行比较。对具有相容禁忌证且未接受 tPA 治疗的患者进行单独分析。主要结局为症状性颅内出血(SICH)的发生率。次要结局为短期临床进展、短期结局和 30 天死亡率。

结果

在接受 tPA 治疗的 265 例患者中,135 例(50.9%)有明确禁忌证,130 例(49.1%)无禁忌证。有或无禁忌证的患者 SICH 发生率相似(P=0.305)。有 tPA 禁忌证的患者临床改善率相似(P=0.504),结局较差的趋势(P=0.052)和死亡率较高(P=0.005)。调整年龄、性别和入院时的国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分后,tPA 禁忌证与短期结局或死亡率之间无关联。接受 tPA 治疗和未接受 tPA 治疗的有禁忌证的患者短期结局和死亡率相似(n=134)。

结论

对于存在多种 tPA 明确禁忌证的脑卒中患者,静脉溶栓治疗 tPA 可能是安全有效的。前瞻性随机试验至关重要,需要明确重新评估当前 tPA 禁忌证的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验