Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e000950. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000950. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
Increased left ventricular (LV) stimulus intensity has been shown to improve conduction velocity and cardiac output. However, high-output pacing would shorten device battery life. Our prospective trial analyzed the clinical effects of high- versus low-output LV pacing.
Thirty-nine patients undergoing initial cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation with bipolar LV leads were assigned to 3 months of either high-output LV pacing (Hi) or low-output LV pacing (Lo) in a randomized, blinded crossover fashion. Hi and Lo settings were determined with a rigorous intraoperative protocol specific to each patient. Clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained at randomization, at 3 months, and a subsequent 3 months after crossover. Mean age was 66.4±9.8 years, and mean QRS duration was 159.3±23.1 ms. Compared to baseline, both arms had significant improvements in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure score (given as mean [95% confidence interval]) (baseline versus Lo: 43.3 [35.5 to 51.1] versus 21.3 [14.6 to 28.0], P<0.01; baseline versus Hi: 43.3 [35.5 to 51.1] versus 23.6 [16.1 to 31.1], P<0.01) and 6-minute walk distance (baseline versus Lo: 692 ft [581 to 804] versus 995 ft [876 to 1114], P<0.01; baseline versus Hi: 699 ft [585 to 813] versus 982 ft [857 to 1106], P<0.01). Although both Hi and Lo arms had some echocardiographic parameters that significantly improved compared to baseline (baseline end-diastolic diameter 5.7 cm [5.5 to 6.0] versus Lo 5.5 cm [5.1 to 5.8], P<0.01; baseline end-systolic diameter 4.9 cm [4.6 to 5.3] versus Hi 4.7 cm [4.3 to 5.0], P<0.05), there were no significant differences observed when comparing the Hi- versus Lo-output arms.
Low-output LV pacing with a relatively narrow safety margin above capture threshold affords significant improvement from baseline and is clinically equivalent to high-output LV pacing. These data support a strategy of minimizing the programmed LV safety margin to increase battery life in cardiac resynchronization therapy devices.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01060449.
增加左心室(LV)刺激强度已被证明可以提高传导速度和心输出量。然而,高输出起搏会缩短设备电池寿命。我们的前瞻性试验分析了高与低输出 LV 起搏的临床效果。
39 名接受初始心脏再同步治疗设备植入的患者,采用双极 LV 导联,以随机、盲法交叉方式分为 3 个月高输出 LV 起搏(Hi)或低输出 LV 起搏(Lo)。Hi 和 Lo 设置是根据每个患者的严格术中方案确定的。在随机分组、3 个月和随后的 3 个月交叉后,获得临床和超声心动图数据。平均年龄为 66.4±9.8 岁,平均 QRS 持续时间为 159.3±23.1ms。与基线相比,两组患者明尼苏达州心力衰竭生活质量评分(以平均值[95%置信区间]表示)均有显著改善(基线与 Lo:43.3[35.5 至 51.1]与 21.3[14.6 至 28.0],P<0.01;基线与 Hi:43.3[35.5 至 51.1]与 23.6[16.1 至 31.1],P<0.01)和 6 分钟步行距离(基线与 Lo:692 英尺[581 至 804]与 995 英尺[876 至 1114],P<0.01;基线与 Hi:699 英尺[585 至 813]与 982 英尺[857 至 1106],P<0.01)。尽管 Hi 和 Lo 臂都有一些超声心动图参数与基线相比有显著改善(基线舒张末期直径 5.7cm[5.5 至 6.0]与 Lo 5.5cm[5.1 至 5.8],P<0.01;基线收缩末期直径 4.9cm[4.6 至 5.3]与 Hi 4.7cm[4.3 至 5.0],P<0.05),但 Hi 与 Lo 输出臂之间没有观察到显著差异。
在捕获阈值以上具有相对较窄安全裕度的低输出 LV 起搏可显著改善基线,并与高输出 LV 起搏具有临床等效性。这些数据支持在心脏再同步治疗设备中最小化编程 LV 安全裕度以延长电池寿命的策略。