The US Supreme Court decision on the constitutional legitimacy of the Affordable Care Act.
作者信息
Oliver Adam
机构信息
LSE Health and Social Care, London School of Economics, UK.
出版信息
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):111-2. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000369.
PMID:23336494
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The US Supreme Court decision on the constitutional legitimacy of the Affordable Care Act.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):111-2. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000369.
2
The Affordable Care Act and the Supreme Court: American health care reform inches forward despite dysfunctional political institutions and politics.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):113-8. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000370.
3
US Supreme Court hears arguments against health reform act.
BMJ. 2012 Apr 2;344:e2463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2463.
4
Health care reform after the Supreme Court: even more known unknowns.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):139-43. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000412.
5
Much ado about nothing: the US Supreme Court's rules on health reform.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):125-32. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000394.
6
The road ahead for the Affordable Care Act.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):199-201. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1206845. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
7
Affordable convergence: "reasonable interpretation" and the Affordable Care Act.
Harv Law Rev. 2012 Nov;126(1):117-49.
8
NFIB vs Sebelius: the political expediency of the Roberts Court.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):119-24. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000382.
9
US Supreme Court upholds ACA subsidies.
Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):16-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61187-4.
10
How will the US Supreme Court rule on health reform?
BMJ. 2012 Apr 11;344:e2626. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2626.
Zotero 插件