Suppr超能文献

帕金森病的心理理论缺陷:执行功能障碍的产物?

Theory of mind deficits in Parkinson's disease: a product of executive dysfunction?

机构信息

Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Neuropsychiatry, The Barberry, National Centre for Mental Health, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Neuropsychology. 2013 Jan;27(1):37-47. doi: 10.1037/a0031302.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) can perform poorly on tasks involving theory of mind (ToM): the ability to reason about mental states. We investigated whether patients' ToM deficits were independent of executive dysfunction.

METHOD

Experiment 1 aimed to establish that ToM deficits were present, and 2 following experiments manipulated the working memory (WM) demands of the ToM task.

RESULTS

In Experiment 1, 15 patients with PD performed significantly more poorly than controls on a false belief vignette task but not on a faux pas task. Errors were related to poor verbal fluency. In Experiment 2, 24 patients with PD made fewer errors on shorter false belief vignettes than the original FBT, and errors on the latter were related to WM impairment. In Experiment 3, the FBT was presented as a comic strip visible throughout questioning, reducing WM demands. Patients (n = 24) made memory errors but no false belief errors on the comic strip. They exhibited no verbal fluency or WM impairments, but did exhibit deficits on a black-and-white Stroop task. False belief errors were not correlated with executive performance.

CONCLUSIONS

PD patients made very few ToM errors that were independent of errors on memory questions, so in this sample, ToM deficits per se appear unlikely. However, patients still made errors on ToM tasks when associated incidental WM demands were considerably reduced, highlighting the need for future investigations of ToM in PD to account for the role of more general cognitive restrictions exhibited by even some medicated, early stage patients.

摘要

目的

帕金森病(PD)患者在涉及心理理论(ToM)的任务中表现不佳:即推理心理状态的能力。我们研究了患者的 ToM 缺陷是否与执行功能障碍无关。

方法

实验 1 旨在确定 ToM 缺陷的存在,随后的实验 2 操纵了 ToM 任务的工作记忆(WM)需求。

结果

在实验 1 中,15 名 PD 患者在虚假信念情节任务中的表现明显比对照组差,但在失态任务中表现不差。错误与语言流畅性差有关。在实验 2 中,24 名 PD 患者在较短的虚假信念情节上的错误比原始 FBT 少,后者的错误与 WM 损伤有关。在实验 3 中,FBT 以漫画的形式呈现,在整个提问过程中都可见,降低了 WM 需求。患者(n = 24)在漫画上犯了记忆错误,但没有犯虚假信念错误。他们没有表现出语言流畅性或 WM 损伤,但在黑白 Stroop 任务中表现出缺陷。虚假信念错误与执行性能无关。

结论

PD 患者犯的 ToM 错误很少,与记忆问题无关,因此在这个样本中,ToM 缺陷本身似乎不太可能。然而,当关联的附带 WM 需求大大减少时,患者仍然在 ToM 任务上犯错误,这突出表明未来对 PD 中的 ToM 进行研究时,需要考虑到即使是一些经过药物治疗的早期患者也表现出的更普遍的认知限制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验