Department of Developmental and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
Aggress Behav. 2013 Mar-Apr;39(2):99-113. doi: 10.1002/ab.21458. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
This study reports reliability and validity of the Dutch Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ). In total, 845 participants completed the RPQ along with other measures of aggression. Groups consisted of non-offender participants, criminal offenders, youngsters (age 6-18), and adults (age above 18). Test-retest stability in a subsample of 324 childhood arrestees was good (all ICC's > 0.41). A confirmatory factor analysis supported the same two-factor structure as in the original RPQ. Convergent validity was adequate (all r's > 0.16). Moreover, results demonstrated that the proactive and reactive subscales were differentially related to measurements of callousness and impulsiveness, respectively. Criterion validity was shown in that non-offender subjects demonstrated significantly lower RPQ scores than offender samples. Finally, construct validity was demonstrated in that violent offenders showed higher aggression scores than non-violent offenders. Proactive aggression showed different developmental trajectories within non-offender versus criminal samples, indicating that this form of aggression may be more pathological.
本研究报告了荷兰反应性-主动性攻击问卷(RPQ)的信度和效度。总共有 845 名参与者完成了 RPQ 以及其他攻击行为的测量。参与者群体包括非犯罪者、罪犯、青少年(6-18 岁)和成年人(18 岁以上)。324 名有过儿童逮捕记录的参与者的重测信度良好(所有 ICC 均大于 0.41)。验证性因素分析支持与原始 RPQ 相同的两因素结构。聚合效度是足够的(所有 r 值大于 0.16)。此外,结果表明,主动和被动分量表分别与冷酷和冲动的测量值存在不同的相关性。在非犯罪者的样本中,标准有效性表现为 RPQ 得分明显低于罪犯样本。最后,结构有效性表明,暴力罪犯比非暴力罪犯表现出更高的攻击性得分。主动攻击在非犯罪者和罪犯样本中表现出不同的发展轨迹,这表明这种形式的攻击可能更具病态。