Department of Vascular Surgery, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 7;368(6):513-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111096.
The clinically appropriate duration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with acute medical illnesses is unknown. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban administered for an extended period, as compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin administered for a standard period, followed by placebo.
We randomly assigned patients 40 years of age or older who were hospitalized for an acute medical illness to receive subcutaneous enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, for 10±4 days and oral placebo for 35±4 days or to receive subcutaneous placebo for 10±4 days and oral rivaroxaban, 10 mg once daily, for 35±4 days. The primary efficacy outcomes were the composite of asymptomatic proximal or symptomatic venous thromboembolism up to day 10 (noninferiority test) and up to day 35 (superiority test). The principal safety outcome was the composite of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.
A total of 8101 patients underwent randomization. A primary efficacy outcome event occurred in 78 of 2938 patients (2.7%) receiving rivaroxaban and 82 of 2993 patients (2.7%) receiving enoxaparin at day 10 (relative risk with rivaroxaban, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.31; P=0.003 for noninferiority) and in 131 of 2967 patients (4.4%) who received rivaroxaban and 175 of 3057 patients (5.7%) who received enoxaparin followed by placebo at day 35 (relative risk, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.96; P=0.02). A principal safety outcome event occurred in 111 of 3997 patients (2.8%) in the rivaroxaban group and 49 of 4001 patients (1.2%) in the enoxaparin group at day 10 (P<0.001) and in 164 patients (4.1%) and 67 patients (1.7%) in the respective groups at day 35 (P<0.001).
In acutely ill medical patients, rivaroxaban was noninferior to enoxaparin for standard-duration thromboprophylaxis. Extended-duration rivaroxaban reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research and Development; MAGELLAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00571649.).
在患有急性内科疾病的住院患者中,血栓预防的临床适宜持续时间尚不清楚。在这项多中心、随机、双盲试验中,我们评估了延长疗程口服利伐沙班与标准疗程皮下依诺肝素相比的疗效和安全性,之后给予安慰剂。
我们将年龄在 40 岁及以上、因急性内科疾病住院的患者随机分为两组:接受皮下依诺肝素 40mg,每日一次,持续 10±4 天,并接受口服安慰剂持续 35±4 天;或接受皮下安慰剂持续 10±4 天,并接受每日一次口服利伐沙班 10mg,持续 35±4 天。主要疗效终点是无症状近端或有症状静脉血栓栓塞在第 10 天(非劣效性检验)和第 35 天(优效性检验)的复合终点。主要安全性终点是大出血或临床上相关非大出血的复合终点。
共 8101 例患者接受了随机分组。在第 10 天,利伐沙班组 2938 例患者中有 78 例(2.7%)和依诺肝素组 2993 例患者中有 82 例(2.7%)发生了主要疗效终点事件(利伐沙班的相对风险,0.97;95%置信区间[CI],0.71 至 1.31;P=0.003,非劣效性检验);在第 35 天,利伐沙班组 2967 例患者中有 131 例(4.4%)和依诺肝素组 3057 例患者中有 175 例(5.7%)接受了安慰剂治疗,发生了主要安全性终点事件(相对风险,0.77;95%CI,0.62 至 0.96;P=0.02,优效性检验)。利伐沙班组 3997 例患者中有 111 例(2.8%)和依诺肝素组 4001 例患者中有 49 例(1.2%)在第 10 天发生了主要安全性终点事件(P<0.001);在第 35 天,利伐沙班组 3997 例患者中有 164 例(4.1%)和依诺肝素组 4001 例患者中有 67 例(1.7%)发生了主要安全性终点事件(P<0.001)。
在急性内科疾病患者中,利伐沙班与依诺肝素标准疗程的血栓预防相比不劣效。延长疗程的利伐沙班可降低静脉血栓栓塞的风险。利伐沙班出血风险增加。(由拜耳健康护理制药公司和杨森研发资助;MAGELLAN 临床试验.gov 编号,NCT00571649。)