Suppr超能文献

使用 FDG-PET 测量头颈部鳞状细胞癌的早期治疗反应:量化内在变异性,以了解治疗引起的变化。

Using FDG-PET to measure early treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: quantifying intrinsic variability in order to understand treatment-induced change.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Jul;34(7):1428-33. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3412. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Quantification of both baseline variability and intratreatment change is necessary to optimally incorporate functional imaging into adaptive therapy strategies for HNSCC. Our aim was to define the baseline variability of SUV on FDG-PET scans in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and to compare it with early treatment-induced SUV change.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages III-IV HNSCC were imaged with 2 baseline PET/CT scans and a third scan after 1-2 weeks of curative-intent chemoradiation. SUVmax and SUVmean were measured in the primary tumor and most metabolically active nodal metastasis. Repeatability was assessed with Bland-Altman plots. Mean percentage differences (%ΔSUV) in baseline SUVs were compared with intratreatment %ΔSUV. The repeatability coefficient for baseline %ΔSUV was compared with intratreatment %ΔSUV.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients had double-baseline imaging, and 15 of these patients also had intratreatment scans. Bland-Altman plots showed excellent baseline agreement for nodal metastases SUVmax and SUVmean, but not primary tumor SUVs. The mean baseline %ΔSUV was lowest for SUVmax in nodes (7.6% ± 5.2%) and highest for SUVmax in primary tumor (12.6% ± 9.2%). Corresponding mean intratreatment %ΔSUVmax was 14.5% ± 21.6% for nodes and 15.2% ± 22.4% for primary tumor. The calculated RC for baseline nodal SUVmax and SUVmean were 10% and 16%, respectively. The only patient with intratreatment %ΔSUV above these RCs was 1 of 2 patients with residual disease after CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline SUV variability for HNSCC is less than intratreatment change for SUV in nodal disease. Evaluation of early treatment response should be measured quantitatively in nodal disease rather than the primary tumor, and assessment of response should consider intrinsic baseline variability.

摘要

背景与目的

为了将功能成像最佳地纳入头颈鳞状细胞癌的自适应治疗策略中,需要对基线变异性和治疗中变化进行定量分析。我们的目的是确定头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者 FDG-PET 扫描的 SUV 基线变异性,并将其与早期治疗诱导的 SUV 变化进行比较。

材料与方法

对美国癌症联合委员会分期为 III-IV 期的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者进行两次基线 PET/CT 扫描,并在根治性放化疗后 1-2 周进行第三次扫描。在原发肿瘤和代谢最活跃的淋巴结转移中测量 SUVmax 和 SUVmean。采用 Bland-Altman 图评估重复性。比较基线 SUV 的平均百分比变化(%ΔSUV)与治疗中 %ΔSUV。比较基线 %ΔSUV 的重复性系数与治疗中 %ΔSUV。

结果

17 例患者进行了双基线成像,其中 15 例患者还进行了治疗中扫描。Bland-Altman 图显示淋巴结 SUVmax 和 SUVmean 的基线一致性良好,但原发肿瘤 SUVs 的基线一致性较差。节点 SUVmax 的平均基线 %ΔSUV 最低(7.6%±5.2%),原发肿瘤 SUVmax 的平均基线 %ΔSUV 最高(12.6%±9.2%)。相应的节点和原发肿瘤 SUVmax 的平均治疗中 %ΔSUVmax 分别为 14.5%±21.6%和 15.2%±22.4%。基线淋巴结 SUVmax 和 SUVmean 的计算 RC 分别为 10%和 16%。仅在 CRT 后有残留疾病的 2 例患者中的 1 例患者的治疗中 %ΔSUV 高于这些 RC。

结论

HNSCC 的 SUV 基线变异性小于淋巴结疾病中 SUV 的治疗中变化。应在淋巴结疾病中而不是在原发肿瘤中定量评估早期治疗反应,并且评估反应应考虑内在的基线变异性。

相似文献

3
Prospective evaluation of pretreatment and intratreatment FDG PET-CT SUV stability in primary head and neck cancer.
Head Neck. 2019 Jun;41(6):1889-1894. doi: 10.1002/hed.25624. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
5
Total lesion glycolysis: a possible new prognostic parameter in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
Oral Oncol. 2013 Mar;49(3):261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.09.005. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
8
Changes in cervical cancer FDG uptake during chemoradiation and association with response.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jan 1;85(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.056. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of PET Tracers in Molecular Imaging for Breast Cancer.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Jul 6;22(8):85. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00940-9.
2
Prognostic value of FDG PET/CT during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients.
Radiat Oncol J. 2018 Jun;36(2):95-102. doi: 10.3857/roj.2017.00577. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
3
Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic F-FDG PET.
J Nucl Med. 2017 Apr;58(4):523-532. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186353. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
5
Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Aug;207(2):248-56. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16265. Epub 2016 May 10.
8
Towards multidimensional radiotherapy: key challenges for treatment individualisation.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:934380. doi: 10.1155/2015/934380. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
9
Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and neck tumours: (18)F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Mar;41(3):462-75. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2580-y. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and velocity in predicting head-and-neck cancer outcomes.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):1521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.022. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
2
Prospective trial of synchronous bevacizumab, erlotinib, and concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer.
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 1;18(5):1404-14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1982. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
4
Analysis of pretreatment FDG-PET SUV parameters in head-and-neck cancer: tumor SUVmean has superior prognostic value.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):548-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.050. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
6
Repeatability of metabolically active volume measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in non-small cell lung cancer.
J Nucl Med. 2010 Dec;51(12):1870-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.077255. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
7
Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a multicenter phase I study of patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.
J Nucl Med. 2009 Oct;50(10):1646-54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063347. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
8
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.
J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122S-50S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验