Sanquin - LUMC Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):204-7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835e7408.
Most publications on Red Blood Cell (RBC) storage time are performed in patient groups receiving on average 1-4 RBC transfusions. Here we look at the observational results in the more heavily transfused patient populations studied, which are mostly in trauma or cardiac surgery patients.
New heavily transfused patient groups in which the possible detrimental effects of prolonged RBC storage were studied are HSCT and liver transplant patients. In these studies no associations of prolonged RBC storage with outcome were seen. Apart from these studies, new studies were also reported on ICU patients and cardiac surgery patients. These latter studies reported associations with infections, postoperative length of stay, and renal complications. In these studies similar shortcomings in study design and analysis were encountered as in earlier studies, leading to overestimation of the studied association. Some of the recent studies suggest, contrary to the most encountered opinion, that fresh RBC might be detrimental on some outcomes. Similar observations have recently been presented in other, less heavily transfused populations.
Clinical effects of RBC storage turn out to be determined by far more aspects than storage time alone.
大多数关于红细胞(RBC)储存时间的出版物都是在接受平均 1-4 次 RBC 输血的患者群体中进行的。在这里,我们观察了在接受更多输血的患者群体中进行的观察性研究结果,这些患者主要是创伤或心脏手术患者。
在 HSCT 和肝移植患者等新的大量输血患者群体中,研究了延长 RBC 储存时间可能产生的有害影响。在这些研究中,没有发现延长 RBC 储存时间与结局之间存在关联。除了这些研究,还报告了关于 ICU 患者和心脏手术患者的新研究。这些后续研究报告了与感染、术后住院时间和肾脏并发症的关联。在这些研究中,与早期研究一样,也遇到了研究设计和分析中的类似缺陷,导致对研究关联的高估。一些最近的研究表明,与最常见的观点相反,新鲜的 RBC 可能对某些结果有害。最近在其他输血较少的人群中也提出了类似的观察结果。
RBC 储存的临床效果取决于远远超过储存时间本身的更多方面。