From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Anesth Analg. 2013 May;116(5):1141-1161. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318277a270. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
The use of local anesthetics to reduce acute postoperative pain has a long history, but recent reports have not been systematically reviewed. In addition, the need to include only those clinical studies that meet minimum standards for randomization and blinding must be adhered to. In this review, we have applied stringent clinical study design standards to identify publications on the use of perioperative local anesthetics. We first examined several types of peripheral nerve blocks, covering a variety of surgical procedures, and second, we examined the effects of intentionally administered IV local anesthetic (lidocaine) for suppression of postoperative pain. Thirdly, we have examined publications in which vascular concentrations of local anesthetics were measured at different times after peripheral nerve block procedures, noting the incidence when those levels reached ones achieved during intentional IV administration. Importantly, the very large number of studies using neuraxial blockade techniques (epidural, spinal) has not been included in this review but will be dealt with separately in a later review. The overall results showed a strongly positive effect of local anesthetics, by either route, for suppressing postoperative pain scores and analgesic (opiate) consumption. In only a few situations were the effects equivocal. Enhanced effectiveness with the addition of adjuvants was not uniformly apparent. The differential benefits between drug delivery before, during, or immediately after a surgical procedure are not obvious, and a general conclusion is that the significant antihyperalgesic effects occur when the local anesthetic is present during the acute postoperative period, and its presence during surgery is not essential for this action.
局部麻醉药用于减轻急性术后疼痛的历史由来已久,但最近的报告并未进行系统回顾。此外,必须遵循仅纳入符合随机和盲法最低标准的临床研究的原则。在本综述中,我们应用严格的临床研究设计标准来确定关于围手术期局部麻醉药应用的出版物。我们首先检查了几种类型的外周神经阻滞,涵盖了各种手术程序,其次,我们检查了故意给予 IV 局部麻醉药(利多卡因)抑制术后疼痛的效果。第三,我们检查了在不同时间测量外周神经阻滞后血管内局部麻醉药浓度的出版物,并注意到当这些水平达到在 IV 给药期间达到的水平时的发生率。重要的是,使用神经轴阻滞技术(硬膜外、脊髓)的大量研究未包含在此综述中,但将在以后的单独综述中进行讨论。总体结果表明,局部麻醉药通过任何途径抑制术后疼痛评分和镇痛(阿片类)药物消耗的效果均呈强阳性。只有在少数情况下效果存在疑问。添加佐剂的增强效果并不明显。在手术前、手术期间或手术后立即给予药物的差异益处不明显,一般结论是,当局部麻醉药存在于急性术后期间时,其具有显著的抗痛觉过敏作用,并且其在手术期间的存在对于该作用并非必需。