Trichet B, Falke K, Togut A, Laver M B
Anesthesiology. 1975 Jan;42(1):56-67. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197501000-00010.
The effects of mechanical ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on hemodynamic performance and blood-gas exchange were studied in ten patients following open-heart surgery. Ventilation at constant tidal volume (15 ml/kg body weight) with 10 cm H2O PEEP following aortic valve replacement (AVR) IN FIVE PATIENTs without pulmonary vascular disease was associated with the following significant changes: a rise in arterial Po2, a fall in the alveolar-arterial Po2 gradient when Fio2 = 1.0, decreases in calculated Qs/Qt and cardiac index. Using a similar pattern of ventilation following mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, we found a significant decrease in cardiac index (but less than in the AVR group), a significant elevation of calculated physiologic deadspace (Vd/Vt) and no change in Qs/Qt. An hour after removal of PEEP, intravascular pressures, blood flow and blood-gas exchange values of all patients with AVR had returned to control levels; patients with MVR had persistently significantly low cardiac indices, while Vd/Vt returned to pre-PEEP values. These findings suggest that evaluation of responses to different ventilation patterns must take into account pre-existing V/Q abnormalities secondary to pulmonary vascular disease, particularly when these are secondary to chronic congestive heart failure. Following AVR, Qs/Qt changed in the same direction as cardiac index (CI) irrespective of ventilatory pattern: CI decreased and rose as CI increased. The authors conclude that with increasing severity of pulmonary vascular disease, changes in airway pressure will have an unpredictable effect on cardiac index unless the level of myocardial competence is taken into account. In the presence of ventricular failure, changes in pleural (and therefore transmural) pressures will be minimal compared with the high filling pressures and exert no influence on stroke volume. Although pulmonary venous hypertension was more pronounded in the MVR than in the AVR group, there was no significant difference between the postoperative values for Qs/Qt (Fio2 = 1.0), a condition probably fostered by marked differences in pre-existing V/Q.
在10例心脏直视手术后的患者中,研究了有和没有呼气末正压(PEEP)的机械通气对血流动力学性能和血气交换的影响。在5例无肺血管疾病的患者中,主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)后以恒定潮气量(15 ml/kg体重)并加10 cm H₂O PEEP进行通气,出现了以下显著变化:动脉血氧分压升高,当吸入氧分数(Fio₂)=1.0时肺泡-动脉血氧分压梯度下降,计算得出的肺内分流率(Qs/Qt)和心脏指数降低。在肺血管阻力升高的患者二尖瓣置换术(MVR)后采用类似的通气模式,我们发现心脏指数显著降低(但低于AVR组),计算得出的生理死腔(Vd/Vt)显著升高,而Qs/Qt无变化。去除PEEP 1小时后,所有AVR患者的血管内压力、血流和血气交换值均恢复到对照水平;MVR患者的心脏指数持续显著降低,而Vd/Vt恢复到PEEP前的值。这些发现表明,评估对不同通气模式的反应时,必须考虑到继发于肺血管疾病的预先存在的通气/血流(V/Q)异常,尤其是当这些异常继发于慢性充血性心力衰竭时。AVR后,无论通气模式如何,Qs/Qt与心脏指数(CI)的变化方向相同:CI降低时Qs/Qt降低,CI升高时Qs/Qt升高。作者得出结论,随着肺血管疾病严重程度的增加,气道压力的变化对心脏指数将产生不可预测的影响,除非考虑心肌功能水平。在存在心室衰竭的情况下,与高充盈压相比,胸膜(因此跨壁)压力的变化将最小,并且对每搏量没有影响。尽管MVR组的肺静脉高压比AVR组更明显,但两组术后Qs/Qt(Fio₂ = 1.0)的值之间没有显著差异,这种情况可能是由预先存在的V/Q的显著差异所致。