Suicidality, refractory suffering, and the right to choose death.
作者信息
Rich Ben A
机构信息
University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, 4150 V Street, Suite 2500, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):18-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.760675.
PMID:23428029
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Suicidality, refractory suffering, and the right to choose death.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):18-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.760675.
2
Are decisions made 'in the throes' of treatment-refractory mental illness truly invalid?
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):16-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.760677.
3
Suicide in the context of terminal illness.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):13-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.760680.
4
Respect and rationality: the challenge of attempted suicide.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):24-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.760684.
5
Suicide and the sufficiency of surrogate decision makers.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.769827.
6
Attempted suicide, LGBT identity, and heightened scrutiny.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):20-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.760676.
7
After the suicide attempt: offering patients another chance.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):14-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.760685.
8
Response to open peer commentaries on "Withdrawal of nonfutile life support after attempted suicide".
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):W3-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.769826.
9
Is the principle of proportionality sufficient to guide physicians' decisions regarding withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment after suicide attempts?
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):22-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.760967.
10
The distinction between completing a suicide and assisting one: why treating a suicide attempt does not require closing the "window of opportunity".
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(3):26-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.767077.
Zotero 插件