Goddard M J, Hinberg I
Health Protection Branch, Health and Welfare Canada, Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa.
Stat Med. 1990 Mar;9(3):325-37. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090315.
This paper evaluates the performance of several diagnostic kits for assessing levels of serum prostatic acid phosphatase on patients at different stages of cancer of the prostate. Each patient was studied with several kits. We compare results obtained for receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve methodology with data assumed to follow a normal distribution, with log-transformed data assumed to follow a normal distribution, and when neither of these assumptions holds. There were important differences between the results of the different approaches. For these data, the normal distribution assumption should be used with extreme caution. The log-transformed based results compared favourably with the non-parametric, but unconsidered application of the method should be avoided.
本文评估了几种诊断试剂盒在评估不同前列腺癌阶段患者血清前列腺酸性磷酸酶水平方面的性能。每位患者都使用了几种试剂盒进行研究。我们将通过接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线方法获得的结果与假定服从正态分布的数据、假定经对数转换后服从正态分布的数据以及这两种假设均不成立时的数据进行了比较。不同方法的结果存在重要差异。对于这些数据,应极其谨慎地使用正态分布假设。基于对数转换的结果与非参数结果相比具有优势,但应避免该方法的盲目应用。