Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5041, Australia.
Respirology. 2013 May;18(4):605-15. doi: 10.1111/resp.12071.
The high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and increasing awareness of its potential health consequences has placed significant pressure on laboratory-based sleep services leading to growing waiting lists and delays in diagnosis and treatment. Consequently, there has been increasing interest in the use of simplified, ambulatory models of care involving clinical prediction tools, portable sleep monitoring and home autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure. Researchers are also exploring the potential role for a wider range of health-care providers, including trained nurses and general practitioners, in the primary management of OSA. Recent randomized, controlled studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness of ambulatory management strategies versus traditional laboratory-based care for patients with OSA have consistently demonstrated that comparable patient outcomes can be achieved. The cost-effectiveness of these strategies is currently being debated, and further research examining the long-term economic implications of ambulatory models of care is needed.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的高患病率和对其潜在健康后果的认识不断提高,给基于实验室的睡眠服务带来了巨大压力,导致等待名单不断增加,诊断和治疗也出现延误。因此,人们越来越感兴趣的是使用简化的、门诊式的护理模式,包括临床预测工具、便携式睡眠监测和家庭自动滴定持续气道正压通气。研究人员还在探索更广泛的医疗保健提供者(包括经过培训的护士和全科医生)在 OSA 初步管理中的潜在作用。最近的随机对照研究评估了门诊管理策略与传统基于实验室的 OSA 患者护理的临床效果,一致表明可以实现可比的患者结果。这些策略的成本效益目前正在讨论中,需要进一步研究门诊护理模式的长期经济影响。