Wu X P, Liu X L, Wang X L, Blaga R, Fu B Q, Liu P, Bai X, Wang Z J, Rosenthal B M, Shi H N, Sandrine L, Vallee I, Boireau P, Wang F, Zhou X N, Zhao Y, Liu M Y
Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Vet Parasitol. 2013 May 20;194(2-4):198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.01.055. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
Parasite-induced and parasite-regulated larval capsule formation and host immunosuppression are two major characteristics that are unique in Trichinella spp. infections, but the molecule(s) and mechanism(s) that mediate these processes remain largely unknown. Trichinella pseudospiralis and Trichinella spiralis, are obviously different with respect to these two characteristics. A comparative study of these two species, in particular their antigen expression profiles at different developmental stages (the main molecules involved in the cross-talk or interaction between each parasite and its host), may help us better understand the parasite molecules and mechanisms involved. Here, we constructed cDNA libraries from T. pseudospiralis adults (Ad), newborn larvae (NBL) and muscle larvae (ML) mRNA and screened them with pig anti-T. pseudospiralis serum collected 26, 32 and 60 days post-infection (p.i.). The most abundant antigens were found to vary among life-cycle stages. Pyroglutamy peptidase 1-like and 6-phosphogluconolactonase-like genes predominated in the Ad stage and a serine protease (SS2-1-like gene) predominated in NBL similar to that observed in T. spiralis. Muscle larvae expressed proteasome activator complex subunit 3-like and 21 kDa excretory/secretory protein-like genes. This study indicated that parasites of two species may utilise different molecules and mechanisms for larvae capsule formation and host immunosuppression during their infections. Proteins of antigenic genes identified in this study may be also good candidates for diagnosis, treatment or vaccination for T. pseudospiralis infection, and also for the differential diagnosis of two species' infections.
寄生虫诱导并调控的幼虫包囊形成以及宿主免疫抑制是旋毛虫属感染中独有的两个主要特征,但介导这些过程的分子和机制在很大程度上仍不清楚。伪旋毛虫和旋毛虫在这两个特征方面明显不同。对这两个物种进行比较研究,特别是它们在不同发育阶段的抗原表达谱(每种寄生虫与其宿主之间相互作用或对话中涉及的主要分子),可能有助于我们更好地理解其中涉及的寄生虫分子和机制。在此,我们从伪旋毛虫成虫(Ad)、新生幼虫(NBL)和肌幼虫(ML)的mRNA构建了cDNA文库,并用感染后26、32和60天收集的猪抗伪旋毛虫血清对其进行筛选。发现最丰富的抗原在生命周期各阶段有所不同。焦谷氨酸肽酶1样和6-磷酸葡萄糖酸内酯酶样基因在成虫阶段占主导,而一种丝氨酸蛋白酶(SS2-1样基因)在新生幼虫中占主导,这与旋毛虫中观察到的情况相似。肌幼虫表达蛋白酶体激活复合物亚基3样和21 kDa排泄/分泌蛋白样基因。这项研究表明,这两个物种的寄生虫在感染期间可能利用不同的分子和机制来形成幼虫包囊和进行宿主免疫抑制。本研究中鉴定出的抗原基因的蛋白质也可能是伪旋毛虫感染诊断、治疗或疫苗接种以及两种物种感染鉴别诊断的良好候选物。