Suppr超能文献

生育护理的时间成本:组建家庭的隐性困难。

Time costs of fertility care: the hidden hardship of building a family.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-1695, USA.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):2025-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.145. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the time that infertile couples spend seeking and utilizing fertility care.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Eight community and academic infertility practices.

PATIENT(S): A total of 319 couples presenting for a fertility evaluation.

INTERVENTION(S): Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants recorded diaries of time spent on provider visits, travel, telephone, and miscellaneous activities. Participants also recorded time off from work due to the physical and mental stress related to fertility care. Linear regression was used to assess relationship between fertility characteristics and time spent pursuing care.

RESULT(S): Diaries were completed by 319 subjects. Over an 18-month time period, the average time spent on fertility care was 125 hours, equating to 15.6 days, assuming an 8-hour workday. For couples utilizing cycle-based treatments (CBT), overall time spent pursuing care averaged 142 hours, versus 58 hours for couples using other therapies, with the majority of time spent on provider visits (73 hours). After multivariable adjustment for clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, possessing a college degree and intensity of fertility treatment were independently associated with increased time spent pursuing fertility care. Furthermore, couples that spent the most time on care were significantly more likely to experience fertility-related stress.

CONCLUSION(S): Over the course of 18 months of observation, couples pursuing fertility treatment dedicated large amounts of time to attaining their family-building goals. This burden on couples adds to the already significant financial and emotional burdens of fertility treatment and provides new insight into the difficulties that these couples face.

摘要

目的

确定不孕夫妇寻求和利用生育护理的时间。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

8 个社区和学术不孕不育诊所。

患者

共 319 对夫妇进行生育评估。

干预措施

面对面和电话访谈以及问卷调查。

主要观察指标

参与者记录了在就诊、旅行、电话和杂项活动上花费的时间。参与者还记录了因生育护理相关的身体和精神压力而请假的时间。线性回归用于评估生育特征与寻求护理时间之间的关系。

结果

319 名受试者完成了日记。在 18 个月的时间里,平均花费在生育护理上的时间为 125 小时,相当于 15.6 天,假设每天工作 8 小时。对于使用周期治疗(CBT)的夫妇,总体上花费在寻求护理上的时间平均为 142 小时,而使用其他疗法的夫妇则为 58 小时,大部分时间都花在就诊上(73 小时)。对临床和社会人口统计学特征进行多变量调整后,拥有大学学历和生育治疗强度与花费更多时间寻求生育护理有关。此外,花费最多时间进行护理的夫妇更有可能经历与生育相关的压力。

结论

在 18 个月的观察期间,寻求生育治疗的夫妇为实现他们的家庭建设目标投入了大量时间。这对夫妇的负担增加了生育治疗已经存在的巨大经济和情感负担,并为这些夫妇所面临的困难提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
Time costs of fertility care: the hidden hardship of building a family.
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):2025-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.145. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
2
Out-of-pocket fertility patient expense: data from a multicenter prospective infertility cohort.
J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.083. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
4
Fertility treatments and outcomes among couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective fertility cohort in the United States.
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jan;95(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.043. Epub 2010 Jul 25.
7
Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States.
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054. Epub 2011 May 25.
9
Are severe depressive symptoms associated with infertility-related distress in individuals and their partners?
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jan;29(1):76-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det412. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
10
Prevalence and predictors of major depressive disorder for fertility treatment patients and their partners.
Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A descriptive analysis of a fertility services waitlist in Eastern Canada.
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Jun 5;5(3):100525. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100525. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Medical crowdfunding for cancer patients seeking fertility treatments: a cross-sectional analysis.
F S Rep. 2025 Jan 28;6(2):193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2025.01.016. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Association between the body roundness index and female infertility: a cross-sectional study from NHANES.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 31;16:1504878. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1504878. eCollection 2025.
5
Assessing the uptake of infertility core outcome set in IVF randomized controlled trials.
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jan 1;40(1):85-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae255.
6
Determinants of utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.
Fertil Steril. 2025 Apr;123(4):709-717. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.036. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
7
The Annual Economic Burden of Uterine Fibroids in the United States (2010 Versus 2022): A Comparative Cost-Analysis.
Reprod Sci. 2024 Dec;31(12):3743-3756. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01727-0. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
8
Third birth intention of the working women with two existing children in Hainan Island, China: The impact of fertility costs and utility.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 2;10(13):e33939. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33939. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States.
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054. Epub 2011 May 25.
3
Costs of infertility treatment: results from an 18-month prospective cohort study.
Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):915-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.026. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
4
Fertility treatments and outcomes among couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective fertility cohort in the United States.
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jan;95(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.043. Epub 2010 Jul 25.
5
Predictors of not pursuing infertility treatment after an infertility diagnosis: examination of a prospective U.S. cohort.
Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2369-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.068. Epub 2010 May 14.
7
Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study.
Hum Reprod. 2008 Sep;23(9):2050-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den219. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
8
Utilization of infertility services: how much does money matter?
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):971-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00640.x.
9
Cost of cancer care: the patient perspective.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):228-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.9111.
10
Patient time costs associated with cancer care.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jan 3;99(1):14-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验