Hariri Tabrizi Sanaz, Aghamiri S Mahmoud Reza, Farzaneh Farah, Sterenborg Henricus J C M
Department of Radiation Medicine Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran,
Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Mar;29(2):831-45. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1288-3. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
In order to investigate the effectiveness of optical spectroscopy for in vivo diagnosis of cervical pre-cancerous conditions, a series of published studies are surveyed. The six optical technologies investigated include fluorescence spectroscopy, reflectance spectroscopy, and their combination using point probe or multispectral imaging approaches. Searching in the well-known databases, the most recent published works were sought out. Various aspects of the studies were evaluated including the details of the technology used, the pathologic threshold for tissue classification and the gold standard, the study population and prevalence of disease in this population, the method of measurement, the number of clinicians involved in the study, the classification and validation algorithms, and the performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity and, when available, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Forty-four studies conducted from 1994 to 2012 were evaluated. The data are gathered in two comprehensive tables, and five illustrations are provided to simplify a comparison between studies from different points of view. There is a broad band of studies from small pilot studies through phase III clinical trials. Among the reviewed articles, only three factors were found to influence the performance of the optical spectroscopy studies. Multispectral approaches show higher specificity than the point probe approaches (p = 0.001). The use of acetic acid before measurement and prevalence of disease among the studied population, also, have an impact on the sensitivity and specificity of the studies (p < 0.05), respectively.
为了研究光学光谱法对宫颈癌前病变进行活体诊断的有效性,我们对一系列已发表的研究进行了调查。所研究的六种光学技术包括荧光光谱法、反射光谱法,以及使用点探针或多光谱成像方法的二者结合。在知名数据库中进行检索,找出了最新发表的研究成果。对这些研究的各个方面进行了评估,包括所使用技术的细节、组织分类的病理阈值和金标准、研究人群以及该人群中的疾病患病率、测量方法、参与研究的临床医生数量、分类和验证算法,以及在敏感性、特异性方面的表现,如有可用数据,还包括受试者工作特征曲线下的面积。对1994年至2012年进行的44项研究进行了评估。数据汇总在两个综合表格中,并提供了五幅插图,以便从不同角度简化各研究之间的比较。从小型试点研究到III期临床试验,有一系列广泛的研究。在所审查的文章中,仅发现三个因素会影响光学光谱研究的性能。多光谱方法显示出比点探针方法更高的特异性(p = 0.001)。测量前使用醋酸以及所研究人群中的疾病患病率也分别对研究的敏感性和特异性有影响(p < 0.05)。