School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.
Mol Pharm. 2013 May 6;10(5):1623-43. doi: 10.1021/mp300502m. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS), which is a scientific approach to categorize active drug ingredient based on its solubility and intestinal permeability into one of the four classes, has been used to set the pharmaceutical quality standards for drug products in western society. However, it has received little attention in the area of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM). This is likely, in part, due to the presence of multiple active components as well as lack of standardization of CHM. In this report, we apply BCS classification to CHMs provisionally as a basis for establishing improved in vitro quality standards. Based on a top-200 drugs selling list in China, a total of 31 CHM products comprising 50 official active marker compounds (AMCs) were provisionally classified according to BCS. Information on AMC content and doses of these CHM products were retrieved from the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. BCS parameters including solubility and permeability of the AMCs were predicted in silico (ACD/Laboratories). A BCS classification of CHMs according to biopharmaceutical properties of their AMCs is demonstrated to be feasible in the current study and can be used to provide a minimum set of quality standards. Our provisional results showed that 44% of the included AMCs were classified as Class III (high solubility, low permeability), followed by Class II (26%), Class I (18%), and Class IV (12%). A similar trend was observed when CHMs were classified in accordance with the BCS class of AMCs. Most (45%) of the included CHMs were classified as Class III, followed by Class II (16%), Class I (10%), and Class IV (6%); whereas 23% of the CHMs were of mixed class due to the presence of multiple individual AMCs with different BCS classifications. Moreover, about 60% of the AMCs were classified as high-solubility compounds (Class I and Class III), suggesting an important role for an in vitro dissolution test in setting quality control standards ensuring consistent biopharmaceutical quality for the commercially available CHM products. That is, provisionally, more than half of the AMCs of the top-selling CHMs included in this study would be candidates for a bioequivalence (BE) biowaiver, based on WHO recommendations and EMEA guidelines. Thus a dissolution requirement on these AMCs would represent a significant advance in the pharmaceutical quality of CHM today.
生物药剂分类系统(BCS)是一种基于药物活性成分的溶解度和肠道渗透性将其分为四类的科学方法,已被用于确定西药物品的药物质量标准。然而,它在中国草药(CHM)领域几乎没有受到关注。部分原因可能是由于存在多种活性成分以及缺乏 CHM 的标准化。在本报告中,我们将 BCS 分类应用于 CHM 作为建立改进的体外质量标准的基础。基于中国销售前 200 种药物清单,共选择了 31 种 CHM 产品,这些产品包含 50 种官方活性标记化合物(AMCs),根据 BCS 进行了暂定分类。从《中国药典》中检索到这些 CHM 产品的 AMC 含量和剂量信息。通过计算机预测(ACD/Laboratories)来获得 AMCs 的 BCS 参数,包括溶解度和渗透性。本研究证明,根据 AMCs 的生物药剂学特性对 CHM 进行 BCS 分类是可行的,可用于提供最低限度的质量标准。我们的初步结果表明,在所包括的 AMCs 中,44%被分类为 III 类(高溶解度,低渗透性),其次是 II 类(26%)、I 类(18%)和 IV 类(12%)。当根据 AMCs 的 BCS 类别对 CHM 进行分类时,观察到类似的趋势。在所包括的 CHM 中,大多数(45%)被分类为 III 类,其次是 II 类(16%)、I 类(10%)和 IV 类(6%);由于存在多种具有不同 BCS 分类的单个 AMCs,因此 23%的 CHM 为混合类别。此外,约 60%的 AMCs 被分类为高溶解度化合物(I 类和 III 类),这表明在体外溶解试验在确保市售 CHM 产品的一致生物药剂学质量方面发挥着重要作用。也就是说,根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的建议和欧洲药品管理局(EMEA)的指南,这项研究中包含的畅销 CHM 的 AMCs 中,超过一半可能是生物等效性(BE)生物豁免的候选者。因此,对这些 AMCs 提出溶解要求将是当今 CHM 药物质量的一个重大进步。