Suppr超能文献

甲基氯异噻唑啉酮和甲基异噻唑啉酮过敏接触性皮炎及斑贴试验浓度的影响。

Methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone allergic contact dermatitis and the effect of patch test concentration.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Dermatitis. 2013 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-6. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e3182811432.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The isothiazolinones methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) are the active ingredients in a frequently used preservative in cosmetic, household, and industrial products.

OBJECTIVES

This study reviewed our department's cases of allergic contact dermatitis caused by MCI/MI, outlining their clinical presentation and possible sources of sensitization. The effect of changing the concentration of MCI/MI from 0.01% to 0.02% in the British Society for Cutaneous Allergy baseline series was also measured.

METHODS

A total of 964 patients were patch tested to the British Society for Cutaneous Allergy baseline series in our department over 4 years. Patients were tested either to 0.01% MCI/MI (697) or 0.02% MCI/MI (267).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (2.2%) had positive reactions to MCI/MI. Of patients tested to 0.02% MCI/MI, 3.8% had a positive reaction compared with 1.6% of those tested to MCI/MI 0.01%. Ten patients (48%) had perianal dermatitis; of these, 50% had used moist toilet wipes.

CONCLUSIONS

We highlight MCI/MI as important contact allergens found in moist toilet wipes and should be considered particularly in patients with facial, hand, and perianal allergic contact dermatitis. Patch testing to 0.01% MCI/MI may underestimate its allergenic potential, missing more than half of allergic cases compared with testing to 0.02%. To identify isothiazolinone allergy, we recommend that 0.02% MCI/MI should be used in baseline series.

摘要

背景

异噻唑啉酮甲基氯异噻唑啉酮和甲基异噻唑啉酮(MCI/MI)是化妆品、家庭和工业产品中常用防腐剂的有效成分。

目的

本研究回顾了我科由 MCI/MI 引起的过敏性接触性皮炎病例,概述了其临床表现和可能的致敏源。还测量了英国皮肤过敏学会基础系列中 MCI/MI 浓度从 0.01%变为 0.02%的效果。

方法

在我们的部门,4 年来共有 964 名患者接受了英国皮肤过敏学会基础系列的斑贴试验。患者接受 0.01% MCI/MI(697 人)或 0.02% MCI/MI(267 人)测试。

结果

21 名患者(2.2%)对 MCI/MI 有阳性反应。在接受 0.02% MCI/MI 测试的患者中,3.8%有阳性反应,而接受 0.01% MCI/MI 测试的患者中,1.6%有阳性反应。10 名患者(48%)患有肛周皮炎;其中 50%使用了湿厕纸。

结论

我们强调 MCI/MI 是在湿厕纸中发现的重要接触过敏原,应特别考虑在面部、手部和肛周过敏性接触性皮炎患者中考虑。与测试 0.01% MCI/MI 相比,测试 0.01% MCI/MI 可能低估其致敏潜力,漏诊超过一半的过敏病例。为了识别异噻唑啉酮过敏,我们建议在基础系列中使用 0.02% MCI/MI。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验