Suppr超能文献

BRAF V600E 基因突变检测对细胞病理学不确定的甲状腺结节的 Afirma 基因表达分类器的敏感性或特异性有影响吗?

Does addition of BRAF V600E mutation testing modify sensitivity or specificity of the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules?

机构信息

Veracyte, Inc, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Apr;98(4):E761-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3762. Epub 2013 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of BRAF mutation in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules and to investigate whether adding the BRAF test improves diagnostic accuracy of the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC).

DESIGN

BRAF V600E mutational status was determined for DNA extracted from cytologically benign (n = 40), indeterminate (n = 208), and malignant (n = 48) fine-needle aspiration specimens previously categorized by GEC as molecularly Benign or Suspicious. Analytical performance of the BRAF assay was assessed to establish reproducibility and limits of detection. Molecular testing results were correlated with blinded expert histopathological diagnoses.

RESULTS

The BRAF assay detected mutations reproducibly to 2.5% mutant allele frequency. The prevalence of BRAF mutations in cytologically benign specimens was 2 of 40 (5.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-16) and in cytologically malignant specimens was 36 of 48 (75.0%, 95% CI, 60-86). In the cytologically indeterminate category, 10.1% of specimens were BRAF+: 2 of 95 were subcategorized as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (2.1%, 95% CI, 0-7); 1 of 70 as follicular neoplasm or suspicious for follicular neoplasm (1.4%, 95% CI, 0-9); and 18 of 43 as suspicious for malignancy (41.9%, 95% CI, 27-58). All BRAF+ specimens were classified as Suspicious by the GEC.

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF mutations are uncommon in nodules with atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance or follicular neoplasm or suspicious for follicular neoplasm cytology. Most cytologically indeterminate nodules that proved to be malignant were also BRAF-, and all nodules that were false-negative by GEC were also BRAF-. Similarly, all BRAF+ specimens were also GEC Suspicious. Neither GEC test sensitivity nor specificity was improved by addition of BRAF mutation testing.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节中 BRAF 突变的频率,并探讨添加 BRAF 检测是否能提高 Afirma 基因表达分类器(GEC)的诊断准确性。

设计

从先前通过 GEC 分类为分子良性或可疑的细胞学良性(n=40)、不确定(n=208)和恶性(n=48)细针抽吸标本中提取 DNA,确定 BRAF V600E 突变状态。评估 BRAF 检测的分析性能,以确定重复性和检测下限。将分子检测结果与盲法专家组织病理学诊断进行相关性分析。

结果

BRAF 检测可重复性地检测到 2.5%的突变等位基因频率。细胞学良性标本中 BRAF 突变的发生率为 2/40(5.0%,95%置信区间[CI],0-16),细胞学恶性标本中为 36/48(75.0%,95%CI,60-86)。在细胞学不确定的类别中,10.1%的标本为 BRAF+:2/95 被重新分类为意义未确定的不典型或滤泡性病变未确定意义(2.1%,95%CI,0-7);1/70 为滤泡性肿瘤或疑似滤泡性肿瘤(1.4%,95%CI,0-9);18/43 为疑似恶性(41.9%,95%CI,27-58)。所有 BRAF+标本均被 GEC 分类为可疑。

结论

在细胞学表现为意义未确定的不典型或滤泡性病变未确定意义或滤泡性肿瘤或疑似滤泡性肿瘤的结节中,BRAF 突变并不常见。大多数被证实为恶性的细胞学不确定结节也是 BRAF-,而 GEC 假阴性的所有结节也是 BRAF-。同样,所有 BRAF+标本也都是 GEC 可疑。添加 BRAF 突变检测并未提高 GEC 检测的敏感性或特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验