Chafetz Michael D, Biondolillo Alexander M
Independent Practice, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 May;28(3):205-12. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act015. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
The main goal of a severe impairment profile (SIP) on a performance validity test (PVT) is to help reduce the false-positive rate when identifying non-credible effort in people who are truly impaired. A secondary goal is to help with clinical judgment about impairment itself. Although there is adequate specificity for the SIP in severely impaired individuals, a large proportion of simulators can produce an SIP. Given that Social Security Disability (SSD) claimants are typically low functioning and also seeking compensation, it was of interest to know whether the SIP can be used to exclude truly low-functioning claimants, or whether SSD claimants identified as malingering also produce the SIP, as the simulators in a recent study of this profile. By comparing the SSD claimants to a group of low-functioning Child Protection (CP) claimants who were motivated to do well in order to get their children returned from State custody, the findings clearly show that the SIP is easily produced in criterion-malingerers, but not in those low-functioning CP claimants motivated to do well.
在性能效度测试(PVT)中,严重损伤概况(SIP)的主要目标是在识别真正受损者的不可信努力时,帮助降低假阳性率。次要目标是协助对损伤本身进行临床判断。尽管SIP在严重受损个体中有足够的特异性,但很大一部分模拟者也能产生SIP。鉴于社会保障残疾(SSD)索赔人通常功能低下且寻求赔偿,了解SIP是否可用于排除真正功能低下的索赔人,或者被认定为诈病的SSD索赔人是否也会产生SIP,就像最近一项关于该概况的研究中的模拟者一样,这很有意思。通过将SSD索赔人与一组为了让孩子从国家监护下归还而有动力表现良好的低功能儿童保护(CP)索赔人进行比较,研究结果清楚地表明,SIP在标准诈病者中很容易产生,但在那些有动力表现良好的低功能CP索赔人中则不会。