Suppr超能文献

额眼区和上丘眼球跳动启动的阈机制。

Threshold mechanism for saccade initiation in frontal eye field and superior colliculus.

机构信息

Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jun;109(11):2767-80. doi: 10.1152/jn.00611.2012. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

Abstract

In an influential model of frontal eye field (FEF) and superior colliculus (SC) activity, saccade initiation occurs when the discharge rate of either single neurons or a population of neurons encoding a saccade motor plan reaches a threshold level of activity. Conflicting evidence exists for whether this threshold is fixed or can change under different conditions. We tested the fixed-threshold hypothesis at the single-neuron and population levels to help resolve the inconsistency between previous studies. Two rhesus monkeys performed a randomly interleaved pro- and antisaccade task in which they had to look either toward (pro) or 180° away (anti) from a peripheral visual stimulus. We isolated visuomotor (VM) and motor (M) neurons in the FEF and SC and tested three specific predictions of a fixed-threshold hypothesis. We found little support for fixed thresholds. First, correlations were never totally absent between presaccadic discharge rate and saccadic reaction time when examining a larger (plausible) temporal period. Second, presaccadic discharge rates varied markedly between saccade tasks. Third, visual responses exceeded presaccadic motor discharges for FEF and SC VM neurons. We calculated that only a remarkably strong bias for M neurons in downstream projections could render the fixed-threshold hypothesis plausible at the population level. Also, comparisons of gap vs. overlap conditions indicate that increased inhibitory tone may be associated with stability of thresholds. We propose that fixed thresholds are the exception rather than the rule in FEF and SC, and that stabilization of an otherwise variable threshold depends on task-related, inhibitory modulation.

摘要

在一个有影响力的额眼运动区(FEF)和上丘(SC)活动模型中,当编码扫视运动计划的单个神经元或神经元群体的放电率达到活动的阈值水平时,扫视就会发生。关于这个阈值是固定的还是在不同条件下可以改变,存在相互矛盾的证据。我们在单个神经元和神经元群体水平上测试了固定阈值假设,以帮助解决先前研究之间的不一致。两只恒河猴执行了一个随机交错的前向和反向扫视任务,要求它们要么看向(前向)或 180°远离(反向)一个外围视觉刺激。我们在 FEF 和 SC 中分离出视觉运动(VM)和运动(M)神经元,并测试了固定阈值假设的三个具体预测。我们几乎没有发现固定阈值的证据。首先,当检查更大(合理)的时间周期时,在扫视前放电率和扫视反应时间之间的相关性从未完全消失。其次,扫视任务之间的扫视前放电率差异显著。第三,FEF 和 SC VM 神经元的视觉反应超过了扫视前的运动放电。我们计算出,只有下游投射中 M 神经元的显著偏差才能使固定阈值假设在群体水平上具有合理性。此外,对间隙与重叠条件的比较表明,抑制性张力的增加可能与阈值的稳定性有关。我们提出,在 FEF 和 SC 中,固定阈值是例外而不是规则,并且否则可变阈值的稳定取决于与任务相关的抑制性调制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验