Suppr超能文献

基于 C 臂锥形束 CT 与 MRI 的肝细胞癌半自动容积肿瘤分割比较

Semiautomatic volumetric tumor segmentation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between C-arm cone beam computed tomography and MRI.

机构信息

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Sheikh Zayed Tower, Suite 7203, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2013 Apr;20(4):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.11.009.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the precision and reproducibility of a semiautomatic tumor segmentation software in measuring tumor volume of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before the first transarterial chemo-embolization (TACE) on contrast-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) and intraprocedural dual-phase C-arm cone beam computed tomography (DP-CBCT) images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen HCCs were targeted in 19 patients (one per patient) who underwent baseline diagnostic CE-MRI and an intraprocedural DP-CBCT. The images were obtained from CE-MRI (arterial phase of an intravenous contrast medium injection) and DP-CBCT (delayed phase of an intra-arterial contrast medium injection) before the actual embolization. Three readers measured tumor volumes using a semiautomatic three-dimensional volumetric segmentation software that used a region-growing method employing non-Euclidean radial basis functions. Segmentation time and spatial position were recorded. The tumor volume measurements between image sets were compared using linear regression and Student's t-test, and evaluated with intraclass-correlation analysis (ICC). The inter-rater Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) assessed the segmentation spatial localization.

RESULTS

All 19 HCCs were analyzed. On CE-MRI and DP-CBCT examinations, respectively, 1) the mean segmented tumor volumes were 87 ± 8 cm(3) (2-873) and 92 ± 10 cm(3) (1-954), with no statistical difference of segmented volumes by readers of each tumor between the two imaging modalities and the mean time required for segmentation was 66 ± 45 seconds (21-173) and 85 ± 34 seconds (17-214) (P = .19); 2) the ICCs were 0.99 and 0.974, showing a strong correlation among readers; and 3) the inter-rater DSCs showed a good to excellent inter-user agreement on the spatial localization of the tumor segmentation (0.70 ± 0.07 and 0.74 ± 0.05, P = .07).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a strong correlation, a high precision, and excellent reproducibility of semiautomatic tumor segmentation software in measuring tumor volume on CE-MRI and DP-CBCT images. The use of the segmentation software on DP-CBCT and CE-MRI can be a valuable and highly accurate tool to measure the volume of hepatic tumors.

摘要

背景与目的

评估一种半自动肿瘤分割软件在经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)前测量肝细胞癌(HCC)肿瘤体积的精确性和可重复性,该软件基于对比增强磁共振成像(CE-MRI)和术中双能 C 臂锥形束 CT(DP-CBCT)图像。

材料与方法

19 名患者(每位患者 1 个病灶)的 19 个 HCC 病灶纳入本研究,所有患者均接受基线诊断性 CE-MRI 和术中 DP-CBCT 检查。CE-MRI 为静脉注射对比剂的动脉期,DP-CBCT 为动脉内对比剂的延迟期,两次扫描均在实际栓塞前进行。三位读者使用基于非欧几里得径向基函数的区域生长法的半自动三维容积分割软件来测量肿瘤体积。记录分割时间和空间位置。使用线性回归和学生 t 检验比较两组图像之间的肿瘤体积测量值,并采用组内相关系数(ICC)进行评估。三位读者的 Dice 相似性系数(DSC)评估分割的空间定位。

结果

共分析了 19 个 HCC 病灶。在 CE-MRI 和 DP-CBCT 检查中,1)三位读者分别测量的肿瘤分割体积为 87 ± 8 cm3(2-873)和 92 ± 10 cm3(1-954),两种成像方式下不同读者测量的同一病灶的肿瘤体积无统计学差异,且分割所需的平均时间分别为 66 ± 45 秒(21-173)和 85 ± 34 秒(17-214)(P =.19);2)ICC 分别为 0.99 和 0.974,表明读者之间具有很强的相关性;3)在肿瘤分割的空间定位方面,读者间 DSCs 显示出较好到极好的一致性(0.70 ± 0.07 和 0.74 ± 0.05,P =.07)。

结论

本研究表明,半自动肿瘤分割软件在测量 CE-MRI 和 DP-CBCT 图像上的肿瘤体积时具有很强的相关性、高精度和极好的可重复性。该分割软件在 DP-CBCT 和 CE-MRI 上的应用可作为测量肝肿瘤体积的一种有价值且高度准确的工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets.CT数据集肝脏分割方法的比较与评估
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Aug;28(8):1251-65. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2013851. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验