Yang Chunyan, Bear George G, Chen Fang Fang, Zhang Wei, Blank Jessica C, Huang Xishan
School of Education, College of Education and Human Development.
Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Delaware.
Sch Psychol Q. 2013 Mar;28(1):7-24. doi: 10.1037/spq0000002.
Although the construct of student climate has been studied extensively in the United States, we know little about how school climate is perceived in other countries. With large class sizes yet higher academic achievement and less disruptive and aggressive student behaviors, schools in China present a contrast to many schools in the United States. Differences in school climate between the two countries were examined in this study. The sample consisted of 10,400 American and 3,435 Chinese students across three grade levels (elementary, middle, and high school) in 85 American and 22 Chinese schools. Factor structure and measurement invariance across countries were first established for the Modified-Delaware School Climate Survey-Student. Differences in latent means were then tested. Across all three grade levels Chinese students scored significantly higher than American students on all four subscales (Teacher-Student Relations, Student-Student Relations, School Liking, and Fairness of School Rules). Effects sizes tended to be smallest in elementary schools and largest in middle schools. Significant differences between American and Chinese students exist in their perceptions of school climate. It is likely that those differences can be attributed to cultural differences in respect of authority, academic and social values, self-regulation and peer-regulation of behaviors, and teachers' classroom management.
尽管学生氛围这一概念在美国已得到广泛研究,但我们对其他国家如何看待学校氛围却知之甚少。中国学校班级规模大,但学术成就更高,学生的破坏性行为和攻击性行为更少,这与美国的许多学校形成了对比。本研究考察了两国学校氛围的差异。样本包括来自美国85所学校和中国22所学校三个年级(小学、初中和高中)的10400名美国学生和3435名中国学生。首先针对修订后的特拉华学校氛围调查问卷-学生版确定了各国的因素结构和测量不变性。然后测试了潜在均值的差异。在所有三个年级中,中国学生在所有四个子量表(师生关系、生生关系、学校喜爱度和校规公平性)上的得分均显著高于美国学生。效应量在小学往往最小,在初中最大。美国和中国学生在对学校氛围的认知上存在显著差异。这些差异很可能归因于在权威、学术和社会价值观、行为的自我调节和同伴调节以及教师课堂管理方面的文化差异。