Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 2115, USA.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Jun;21(6):806-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
To assess reliability and validity of a semi-automated quantitative method for osteoarthritis (OA)-related bone marrow lesion (BML) assessment in the femur and tibia.
In a cross-sectional study of subjects with knee OA, we examined concurrent criterion and clinical validation of a novel method of semi-automated quantitative BML measurement. The primary outcome was total segmented BML volume in femoral and tibial medial and lateral knee compartments. Criterion validation was examined through comparison of BML volumes with Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) scoring. Clinical validation was examined via associations of tibial and femoral BML volume with the Western Ontario and McMaster University OA Index weight-bearing pain questions.
Among the 115 subjects, mean age was 62 years, mean BMI 30.4 (kg/m(2)), 84% were white and 52% male. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for intra-reader reliability was 0.96 and 0.97 for inter-reader reliability. Significant Spearman's correlations were found between segmented BML volume and WORMS BML scoring for tibial medial (0.75) and lateral (0.73) compartments, and for femoral medial (0.72) and lateral (0.88) compartments. Significant positive associations were found between weight-bearing pain and total femoral BML volume (P < 0.003), but not total tibial BML (P < 0.101).
We have documented a moderately strong correlation between a novel measurement method of femoral and tibial BML volume and semi-quantitative WORMS scores, providing evidence of criterion validity. The hypothesis that weight-bearing pain was associated with BML volume was confirmed for total femoral BML volume but not total tibial BML volume. The lack of association between tibial BML volume and pain requires further investigation.
评估一种用于评估股骨和胫骨骨关节炎(OA)相关骨髓病变(BML)的半自动定量方法的可靠性和有效性。
在一项膝关节 OA 患者的横断面研究中,我们检查了一种新的半自动定量 BML 测量方法的同时进行的标准和临床验证。主要结果是股骨和胫骨内侧和外侧膝关节腔的分段 BML 体积。通过将 BML 体积与全器官磁共振成像评分(WORMS)评分进行比较来评估标准验证。通过与西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数负重疼痛问题的胫骨和股骨 BML 体积的相关性来评估临床验证。
在 115 名受试者中,平均年龄为 62 岁,平均 BMI 为 30.4(kg/m²),84%为白人,52%为男性。内读者可靠性的组内相关系数(ICC)为 0.96,外读者可靠性的 ICC 为 0.97。胫骨内侧(0.75)和外侧(0.73)以及股骨内侧(0.72)和外侧(0.88)的分段 BML 体积与 WORMS BML 评分之间存在显著的斯皮尔曼相关性。负重疼痛与总股骨 BML 体积之间存在显著的正相关(P < 0.003),但与总胫骨 BML 体积无关(P < 0.101)。
我们记录了一种用于评估股骨和胫骨 BML 体积的新测量方法与半定量 WORMS 评分之间的中度强相关性,为标准有效性提供了证据。负重疼痛与 BML 体积相关的假设得到了总股骨 BML 体积的证实,但不是总胫骨 BML 体积。胫骨 BML 体积与疼痛之间缺乏关联需要进一步研究。