Linasmita V, Bullangpoti S, Rochanawutanon M, Bhamarapravati Y
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 1990 Feb;73 Suppl 1:28-32.
Colposcopy has become an accepted diagnostic procedure in the management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology. To assess the value of the endocervical curettage in colposcopy, a retrospective review of 125 cases who had the procedure done during the 20-month period (January 1986-August 1988) was carried out. The ECC were positive in 3 out of 57 (5.3%) patients with satisfactory examination and 24 out of 68 (35.3%) patients with unsatisfactory examination. In all 27 cases, there was insufficient tissue to make a diagnosis of invasive carcinoma. Of the 125 patients studied seventy-two (29 in the satisfactory group and 43 in the unsatisfactory group) underwent conization and/or hysterectomy. Endocervical curettage did not eliminate the need for cone biopsy in all cases of unsatisfactory colposcopy. The tissue diagnosis on ECC did not increase the diagnostic accuracy derived from the colposcopic directed biopsies in either group. There were 20 cases of invasive carcinoma (13 MIC, 7 invasive) in this study, the ECC were positive in 9. We concluded that the ECC has limited value in colposcopy.
阴道镜检查已成为宫颈细胞学异常患者管理中被认可的诊断程序。为评估宫颈管刮术在阴道镜检查中的价值,我们对1986年1月至1988年8月这20个月期间接受该手术的125例患者进行了回顾性研究。在57例检查结果满意的患者中,有3例(5.3%)宫颈管刮术结果呈阳性;在68例检查结果不满意的患者中,有24例(35.3%)呈阳性。在所有27例病例中,组织量不足以诊断浸润癌。在研究的125例患者中,72例(满意组29例,不满意组43例)接受了宫颈锥切术和/或子宫切除术。宫颈管刮术并不能消除在所有阴道镜检查不满意的病例中进行宫颈锥切活检的必要性。在两组中,宫颈管刮术的组织诊断均未提高阴道镜引导下活检的诊断准确性。本研究中有20例浸润癌(13例微小浸润癌,7例浸润癌),其中9例宫颈管刮术结果呈阳性。我们得出结论,宫颈管刮术在阴道镜检查中的价值有限。