Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Aug;28(7):1218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
Recently, concerns have been raised about the use of metal-on-metal (MoM) implants. This has led to the recall of several resurfacing and large-diameter total hip arthroplasties (THA). Any MoM interface can be the cause of metal debris and adverse tissue reactions. We analyzed serum metal ions and HOOS scores in 19 of 306 patients treated with a THA with modular neck section. The only MoM interface in this particular implant is the taper between the neck and the stem. The articulating surface consists of a ceramic-on-polyethylene or ceramic-on-ceramic interface. As such, this study looks at the metal ion production from the modular neck section. One of 306 implants needed revision at 52-month follow-up because of an adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD).
最近,人们对金属对金属(MoM)植入物的使用提出了担忧。这导致了几种表面置换和大直径全髋关节置换术(THA)的召回。任何 MoM 界面都可能是金属碎屑和不良组织反应的原因。我们分析了 306 例采用模块化颈段 THA 治疗的 19 例患者的血清金属离子和 HOOS 评分。在这个特殊植入物中,唯一的 MoM 界面是颈部和柄之间的锥度。关节表面由陶瓷对聚乙烯或陶瓷对陶瓷界面组成。因此,本研究着眼于从模块化颈段产生的金属离子。在 52 个月的随访中,由于对金属碎屑的不良反应(ARMD),需要对 306 例植入物中的 1 例进行翻修。