Boyle Deborah A, Sturm Jesse J
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Apr;29(4):430-4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318289e8f1.
Complex febrile seizures (CFSs) are a common diagnosis in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Although multiple studies have shown a low likelihood of intracranial infections and abnormal neuroimaging findings among those who present with CFS, the absence of a consensus recommendation and the diversity of CFS presentations (ie, multiple seizures, prolonged seizure, focal seizure) often drive physicians to do a more extensive workup than needed. Few studies examine the factors that influence providers to pursue invasive testing and emergent neuroimaging.
The objective of this study was to determine the clinical factors associated with a more extensive workup in a cohort of patients who present to the PED with CFSs.
Patient visits to a tertiary care PED with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis of CFS were reviewed from April 2009 to November 2011. Patients included were 6 months to 6 years of age. Complex febrile seizures were defined as febrile seizures lasting 15 minutes or longer, more than 1 seizure in 24 hours, and/or a focal seizure. Charts were reviewed for demographics, clinical parameters (duration of fever, history of febrile seizure, focality of seizure, antibiotic use before PED, and immunization status), PED management (antiepileptic drugs given in the PED or by Emergency Medical Services, empiric antibiotics given in the PED, laboratory testing, lumbar puncture, or computed tomography [CT] scan), and results (cultures, laboratories, or imaging). A logistic regression model was created to determine which clinical parameters were associated with diagnostic testing.
One hundred ninety patients were diagnosed with CFS and met study criteria. Clinical management in the PED included a lumbar puncture in 37%, blood cultures in 88%, urine cultures in 47%, and a head CT scan in 28%. There were no positive cerebral spinal fluid or blood cultures in this cohort. Of the 90 patients, 4 (4.4%) with urine cultures had a urinary tract infection. Of the 53 patients who had head CT imaging, there were no significant findings that guided therapy. The only factor associated with having a lumbar puncture performed was whether empiric antibiotics were used (odds ratio [OR], 2.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-6.8). History of a febrile seizure was associated with lower odds of a lumbar puncture (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.69). In addition, higher age category was also associated with lower odds of a lumbar puncture (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.91). Those who received an antiepileptic drug had a higher odds of getting a head CT (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.6). Furthermore, patients presenting with a focal seizure also had higher odds of getting a head CT (OR, 4.89; 95% CI, 1.41-16.9).
Despite the low utility of associated findings, there are important clinical parameters that are associated with obtaining a lumbar puncture or a head CT as part of the diagnostic workup. National practice parameters to guide evaluation for CFSs in the acute setting are warranted to reduce the amount of invasive testing and imaging.
复杂性热性惊厥(CFS)是儿科急诊科(PED)的常见诊断。尽管多项研究表明,出现CFS的患者发生颅内感染和神经影像学异常的可能性较低,但由于缺乏共识性建议,且CFS表现形式多样(即多次发作、惊厥持续时间延长、局灶性发作),医生往往会进行比必要检查更广泛的检查。很少有研究探讨影响医疗人员进行侵入性检查和紧急神经影像学检查的因素。
本研究的目的是确定在因CFS就诊于PED的患者队列中,与更广泛检查相关的临床因素。
回顾了2009年4月至2011年11月期间在一家三级医疗PED就诊且国际疾病分类第九版诊断为CFS的患者。纳入患者年龄为6个月至6岁。复杂性热性惊厥定义为热性惊厥持续15分钟或更长时间、24小时内发作超过1次和/或局灶性发作。查阅病历以获取人口统计学信息、临床参数(发热持续时间、热性惊厥病史、惊厥的局灶性、PED就诊前使用抗生素情况和免疫状态)、PED管理(在PED或由紧急医疗服务部门给予的抗癫痫药物、在PED给予的经验性抗生素、实验室检查、腰椎穿刺或计算机断层扫描[CT])及结果(培养物、实验室检查或影像学检查)。建立逻辑回归模型以确定哪些临床参数与诊断性检查相关。
190例患者被诊断为CFS并符合研究标准。PED的临床管理包括37%的患者进行了腰椎穿刺、88%的患者进行了血培养、47%的患者进行了尿培养、28%的患者进行了头部CT扫描。该队列中脑脊液或血培养均无阳性结果。在90例进行尿培养的患者中,4例(4.4%)有尿路感染。在53例进行头部CT成像的患者中,没有发现指导治疗的显著异常结果。与进行腰椎穿刺相关的唯一因素是是否使用了经验性抗生素(比值比[OR],2.96;95%置信区间[CI],1.28 - 6.8)。热性惊厥病史与进行腰椎穿刺的较低可能性相关(OR,0.29;95% CI,0.12 - 0.69)。此外,年龄较大也与进行腰椎穿刺的较低可能性相关(OR,0.53;95% CI,0.31 - 0.91)。接受抗癫痫药物治疗的患者进行头部CT检查的可能性更高(OR,3.5;95% CI,1.5 - 8.6)。此外,出现局灶性发作的患者进行头部CT检查的可能性也更高(OR,4.89;95% CI,1.41 - 16.9)。
尽管相关检查结果的实用价值较低,但在诊断检查中,仍有一些重要的临床参数与进行腰椎穿刺或头部CT检查相关。有必要制定国家实践参数以指导急性情况下CFS的评估,从而减少侵入性检查和影像学检查的数量。