Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, U.S.A.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2013 Nov;123(11):2868-72. doi: 10.1002/lary.24025. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To examine differences between total tonsillectomy and partial intracapsular tonsillectomy techniques that may lead to differences in overall cost and resource utilization between these procedures. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative management and outcome factors were examined.
Retrospective review at two university-based tertiary care hospitals from January 2007 to June 2010.
Pediatric patients with obstructive symptoms were divided into those undergoing total tonsillectomy and those undergoing partial intracapsular tonsillectomy. The records of 289 patients who underwent total tonsillectomy and 289 patients who underwent partial intracapsular tonsillectomy were reviewed.
The average age of patients undergoing total and partial tonsillectomies was 5.0 years for both groups. Significant differences for patients undergoing total versus partial tonsillectomies were as follows: operative time (32.4 vs. 26.4 minutes, P < .0001), postanesthesia care unit (PACU) time (174 vs. 91.6 minutes, P < .0001), percent admitted postoperatively (21.5% vs. 1.7%, P < .0001), number requiring pediatric intensive care unit stay (3.5% vs. 0.3%, P < .05), number of readmissions after discharge (3.5% vs. 0.3%, P < .05), and number of postoperative emergency room visits separate from those requiring readmission (4.8% vs. 0%, P < .05). Factors that were not found to be significantly different included number of patients with postoperative hemorrhage and number requiring second operations for tonsillar regrowth.
Previous studies have shown equivalent effectiveness between these two procedures; our study suggests decreased cost and resource utilization with partial tonsillectomy through reduced operative and PACU times and number of postoperative admissions and emergency department visits. As in all retrospective reviews, the findings are potentially confounded by unmeasured variables, including patient and demographic factors.
目的/假设:研究全扁桃体切除术和部分扁桃体囊内切除术之间的差异,这些差异可能导致这两种手术在总费用和资源利用方面存在差异。检查了术前、围手术期和术后管理以及结果因素。
2007 年 1 月至 2010 年 6 月在两所大学附属的三级保健医院进行的回顾性研究。
将有阻塞症状的儿科患者分为行全扁桃体切除术和行部分扁桃体囊内切除术的患者。回顾了 289 例行全扁桃体切除术和 289 例行部分扁桃体囊内切除术患者的记录。
行全扁桃体切除术和部分扁桃体囊内切除术患者的平均年龄均为 5.0 岁。与行全扁桃体切除术相比,行部分扁桃体囊内切除术的患者有以下显著差异:手术时间(32.4 与 26.4 分钟,P<.0001)、麻醉后护理病房(PACU)时间(174 与 91.6 分钟,P<.0001)、术后住院率(21.5%与 1.7%,P<.0001)、需要入住儿科重症监护病房的人数(3.5%与 0.3%,P<.05)、出院后再入院人数(3.5%与 0.3%,P<.05)以及无需再入院的术后急诊就诊次数(4.8%与 0%,P<.05)。未发现明显差异的因素包括术后出血的患者人数和因扁桃体再生而需要再次手术的人数。
之前的研究表明这两种手术的效果相当;我们的研究表明,部分扁桃体切除术通过减少手术和 PACU 时间以及减少术后住院和急诊就诊次数,降低了成本和资源利用。与所有回顾性研究一样,这些发现可能受到未测量变量的影响,包括患者和人口统计学因素。