Suppr超能文献

通过教育和两种联合床边策略预防呼吸机相关性肺炎。

Ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention by education and two combined bedside strategies.

机构信息

Copa D'Or Hospital - Rua Figueiredo Magalhães, 875-CEP 22031-011, Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Jul;25(3):308-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt025. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to reduce the ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence rates through a rational prevention program.

DESIGN

The study was a non-controlled clinical trial with a set of interventions in mechanically ventilated patients from April 2006 until June 2008. Pneumonia rates were analyzed as time series and their mean risks of development were compared before and after the interventions with a non-concurrent cohort using the same time frame (January 2004-March 2006).

SETTING

The study was conducted in a 14-bed medical intensive care unit of private general hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included invasively ventilated patients (n = 224; intervention group) compared with 294 controls (historical cohort).

INTERVENTIONS

An educational module about VAP prevention was introduced at the start of the trial (April 2006). A bundle checklist was used daily concomitantly with a standardized oral care in all patients afterwards. Main outcome measure The main outcome measure was reduction in VAP incidence rates.

RESULTS

The observed mean rate before the intervention was 18.6 ± 7.8/1000 ventilator-days (95% CI 8.7-14.9), decreasing to 11.8 ± 7.8/1000 ventilator-days (95% CI 15.5-21.7) (P = 0.002) after the interventions. Under the adoption of non-informative prior distributions for the parameters of the proposed statistical model, there was a 70% posterior probability in favor of the hypothesis of risk reduction associated with the interventions, regardless their seasonality or secular trends. There was a 38% relative risk reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduction in VAP rates and on their risk after a set of preventive tools was observed. However, some other co-interventions not related to the primary interventions may have contributed to these results.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过合理的预防方案降低呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的发生率。

设计

这是一项非对照临床试验,于 2006 年 4 月至 2008 年 6 月对机械通气患者进行了一组干预措施。通过使用相同的时间框架(2004 年 1 月至 2006 年 3 月)对非同期队列进行比较,对肺炎发生率进行时间序列分析,并比较干预前后的平均发病风险。

设置

该研究在巴西里约热内卢的一家私人综合医院的 14 张病床的内科重症监护病房进行。

参与者

本研究纳入了 224 例接受有创通气的患者(干预组),并与 294 例对照(历史队列)进行了比较。

干预措施

在试验开始时(2006 年 4 月)引入了关于 VAP 预防的教育模块。此后,所有患者每天同时使用捆绑式检查表和标准化口腔护理。

主要结局测量

主要结局测量为降低 VAP 发生率。

结果

干预前观察到的平均发生率为 18.6 ± 7.8/1000 机械通气日(95%CI 8.7-14.9),干预后降至 11.8 ± 7.8/1000 机械通气日(95%CI 15.5-21.7)(P = 0.002)。在采用无信息先验分布对提出的统计模型的参数进行处理后,无论其季节性或季节性趋势如何,都有 70%的后验概率支持与干预相关的风险降低假设。相对风险降低了 38%。

结论

在采用一组预防工具后,VAP 发生率及其风险降低。然而,可能还有其他与主要干预措施无关的联合干预措施促成了这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验