Ogle Christin M, Rubin David C, Siegler Ilene C
Duke University.
J Pers. 2014 Apr;82(2):93-102. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12037. Epub 2013 May 9.
Using longitudinal data, the present study examined change in midlife neuroticism following trauma exposure. Our primary analyses included 670 participants (M(age) = 60.55; 65.22% male, 99.70% Caucasian) who completed the NEO Personality Inventory at ages 42 and 50 and reported their lifetime exposure to traumatic events approximately 10 years later. No differences in pre- and post-trauma neuroticism scores were found among individuals who experienced all of their lifetime traumas in the interval between the personality assessments. Results were instead consistent with normative age-related declines in neuroticism throughout adulthood. Furthermore, longitudinal changes in neuroticism scores did not differ between individuals with and without histories of midlife trauma exposure. Examination of change in neuroticism following life-threatening traumas yielded a comparable pattern of results. Analysis of facet-level scores largely replicated findings from the domain scores. Overall, our findings suggest that neuroticism does not reliably change following exposure to traumatic events in middle adulthood. Supplemental analyses indicated that individuals exposed to life-threatening traumas in childhood or adolescence reported higher midlife neuroticism than individuals who experienced severe traumas in adulthood. Life-threatening traumatic events encountered early in life may have a more pronounced impact on adulthood personality than recent traumatic events.
本研究利用纵向数据,考察了创伤暴露后中年神经质的变化。我们的主要分析纳入了670名参与者(年龄均值 = 60.55岁;65.22%为男性,99.70%为白种人),他们在42岁和50岁时完成了大五人格量表中的神经质分量表,并在大约10年后报告了其一生所经历的创伤事件。在人格评估期间经历了所有一生创伤事件的个体中,未发现创伤前后神经质得分存在差异。相反,研究结果与成年期神经质随年龄的规范性下降一致。此外,有或没有中年创伤暴露史的个体在神经质得分的纵向变化上没有差异。对危及生命的创伤后神经质变化的考察也得出了类似的结果模式。对各层面得分的分析在很大程度上重复了领域得分的研究结果。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,中年期暴露于创伤事件后,神经质并不会可靠地发生变化。补充分析表明,童年或青少年时期经历过危及生命创伤的个体,其中年神经质得分高于成年期经历过严重创伤的个体。生命早期遇到的危及生命的创伤事件,可能比近期的创伤事件对成年期人格产生更显著的影响。