Suppr超能文献

研究中有效组织病理学评分的原则。

Principles for valid histopathologic scoring in research.

作者信息

Gibson-Corley K N, Olivier A K, Meyerholz D K

机构信息

Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 500 Newton Rd, 1165ML, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Email:

出版信息

Vet Pathol. 2013 Nov;50(6):1007-15. doi: 10.1177/0300985813485099. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

Abstract

Histopathologic scoring is a tool by which semiquantitative data can be obtained from tissues. Initially, a thorough understanding of the experimental design, study objectives, and methods is required for the pathologist to appropriately examine tissues and develop lesion scoring approaches. Many principles go into the development of a scoring system such as tissue examination, lesion identification, scoring definitions, and consistency in interpretation. Masking (aka "blinding") of the pathologist to experimental groups is often necessary to constrain bias, and multiple mechanisms are available. Development of a tissue scoring system requires appreciation of the attributes and limitations of the data (eg, nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio data) to be evaluated. Incidence, ordinal, and rank methods of tissue scoring are demonstrated along with key principles for statistical analyses and reporting. Validation of a scoring system occurs through 2 principal measures: (1) validation of repeatability and (2) validation of tissue pathobiology. Understanding key principles of tissue scoring can help in the development and/or optimization of scoring systems so as to consistently yield meaningful and valid scoring data.

摘要

组织病理学评分是一种可从组织中获取半定量数据的工具。最初,病理学家需要透彻理解实验设计、研究目标和方法,以便恰当地检查组织并制定病变评分方法。评分系统的开发涉及许多原则,如组织检查、病变识别、评分定义和解释的一致性。为了限制偏差,病理学家对实验组进行屏蔽(又称“盲法”)通常是必要的,并且有多种机制可供选择。组织评分系统的开发需要了解待评估数据的属性和局限性(例如,名义数据、有序数据、区间数据和比率数据)。本文展示了组织评分的发生率、有序和排名方法以及统计分析和报告的关键原则。评分系统的验证通过两个主要措施进行:(1)重复性验证和(2)组织病理生物学验证。理解组织评分的关键原则有助于评分系统的开发和/或优化,从而始终产生有意义且有效的评分数据。

相似文献

1
Principles for valid histopathologic scoring in research.研究中有效组织病理学评分的原则。
Vet Pathol. 2013 Nov;50(6):1007-15. doi: 10.1177/0300985813485099. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
2
Comparative Pathologists: Ultimate Control Freaks Seeking Validation!比较病理学家:寻求认可的终极控制狂!
Vet Pathol. 2019 Jan;56(1):19-23. doi: 10.1177/0300985818806047. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
4
Common Pitfalls in Analysis of Tissue Scores.组织评分分析中的常见陷阱。
Vet Pathol. 2019 Jan;56(1):39-42. doi: 10.1177/0300985818794250. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
6
Grading and scoring in histopathology.组织病理学中的分级与评分
Histopathology. 1998 Aug;33(2):99-106. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1998.00495.x.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验