Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;74(3):249-55. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m08019.
Little is known about predictors of recovery from bipolar depression or moderators of treatment response. In the present study, we investigated attributional style (a cognitive pattern of explaining the causes of life events) as a predictor of recovery from episodes of bipolar depression and as a moderator of response to psychotherapy for bipolar depression.
106 depressed outpatients with DSM-IV bipolar I or II disorder who were enrolled in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder were randomly assigned to intensive psychotherapy for depression (n = 62) or to collaborative care (n = 44), a minimal psychoeducational intervention. The primary outcome was recovery status at each study visit as measured by the Clinical Monitoring Form. Attributional style was measured at baseline using the Attributional Style Questionnaire. Data were collected between 1998 and 2005.
All analyses were by intention to treat. Extreme attributions predicted a lower likelihood of recovery (P < .01; OR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98) and longer time until recovery (P < .01; OR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99), independent of the effects of initial depression severity. Among individuals with more pessimistic attributional styles, higher initial depression severity predicted a lower likelihood of recovery (P = .01; OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.91) and longer time until recovery (P < .001; OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88). There was no difference in recovery rates between intensive psychotherapy and collaborative care (OR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.40-2.01) in the full sample.
These results suggest that extreme, rigid attributions may be associated with a more severe course of depression and that evaluating attributional style may help clinicians to identify patients who are at risk for experiencing a more severe course of depression.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00012558.
对于双相情感障碍抑郁发作的恢复预测因素以及治疗反应的调节因素,人们知之甚少。在本研究中,我们调查了归因方式(一种解释生活事件原因的认知模式)作为双相情感障碍抑郁发作恢复的预测因素,以及作为双相情感障碍抑郁心理治疗反应的调节因素。
106 名符合 DSM-IV 双相 I 或 II 障碍的抑郁门诊患者参加了系统治疗增强计划以治疗双相情感障碍,他们被随机分配到强化抑郁心理治疗组(n = 62)或合作护理组(n = 44),合作护理是一种最低限度的心理教育干预。主要结果是通过临床监测表在每次研究访问时评估的恢复状态。归因方式在基线时使用归因方式问卷进行测量。数据收集于 1998 年至 2005 年期间。
所有分析均按意向治疗进行。极端归因预测恢复的可能性较低(P <.01;OR = 0.93;95% CI,0.88-0.98),恢复时间更长(P <.01;OR = 0.96;95% CI,0.93-0.99),独立于初始抑郁严重程度的影响。在归因方式较悲观的个体中,较高的初始抑郁严重程度预测恢复的可能性较低(P =.01;OR = 0.64;95% CI,0.45-0.91),恢复时间更长(P <.001;OR = 0.76;95% CI,0.66-0.88)。在全样本中,强化心理治疗和合作护理之间的恢复率没有差异(OR = 0.90;95% CI,0.40-2.01)。
这些结果表明,极端、僵化的归因方式可能与抑郁更严重的病程有关,评估归因方式可能有助于临床医生识别那些经历更严重抑郁病程的风险患者。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00012558。