Suppr超能文献

动物集体决策中的模型:信息不确定性和冲突偏好。

Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences.

机构信息

LARG, Department of Zoology , University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ , UK.

出版信息

Interface Focus. 2012 Apr 6;2(2):226-40. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0090. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

Abstract

Collective decision-making plays a central part in the lives of many social animals. Two important factors that influence collective decision-making are information uncertainty and conflicting preferences. Here, I bring together, and briefly review, basic models relating to animal collective decision-making in situations with information uncertainty and in situations with conflicting preferences between group members. The intention is to give an overview about the different types of modelling approaches that have been employed and the questions that they address and raise. Despite the use of a wide range of different modelling techniques, results show a coherent picture, as follows. Relatively simple cognitive mechanisms can lead to effective information pooling. Groups often face a trade-off between decision accuracy and speed, but appropriate fine-tuning of behavioural parameters could achieve high accuracy while maintaining reasonable speed. The right balance of interdependence and independence between animals is crucial for maintaining group cohesion and achieving high decision accuracy. In conflict situations, a high degree of decision-sharing between individuals is predicted, as well as transient leadership and leadership according to needs and physiological status. Animals often face crucial trade-offs between maintaining group cohesion and influencing the decision outcome in their own favour. Despite the great progress that has been made, there remains one big gap in our knowledge: how do animals make collective decisions in situations when information uncertainty and conflict of interest operate simultaneously?

摘要

集体决策在许多社会性动物的生活中起着核心作用。影响集体决策的两个重要因素是信息不确定性和群体成员之间的冲突偏好。在这里,我将与信息不确定和群体成员之间存在冲突偏好的情况下的动物集体决策相关的基本模型进行了总结和简要回顾。目的是提供关于所采用的不同类型建模方法以及它们解决和提出的问题的概述。尽管使用了广泛的不同建模技术,但结果显示出一致的情况,具体如下。相对简单的认知机制可以导致有效的信息汇集。群体通常面临决策准确性和速度之间的权衡,但适当调整行为参数可以在保持合理速度的同时实现高准确性。动物之间相互依存和独立的适当平衡对于维持群体凝聚力和实现高决策准确性至关重要。在冲突情况下,预计个体之间会有高度的决策共享,以及根据需要和生理状态的临时领导和领导。动物经常面临在保持群体凝聚力和有利于自己影响决策结果之间的关键权衡。尽管已经取得了很大的进展,但我们的知识仍存在一个很大的差距:当信息不确定性和利益冲突同时存在时,动物如何做出集体决策?

相似文献

2
Swarm intelligence: when uncertainty meets conflict.群体智能:当不确定性遇到冲突。
Am Nat. 2013 Nov;182(5):592-610. doi: 10.1086/673253. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
6
Collective decision-making in microbes.微生物的群体决策。
Front Microbiol. 2014 Mar 3;5:54. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00054. eCollection 2014.
8
Conflicts of interest and the evolution of decision sharing.利益冲突与决策共享的演变
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):807-19. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0257.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Evolution of personality differences in leadership.领导人格差异的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8373-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102191108. Epub 2011 May 2.
3
Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age.领导力在大象中:年龄的适应性价值。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 7;278(1722):3270-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0168. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
4
Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals.通过鱼群的集体警戒实现快速而准确的决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 8;108(6):2312-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007102108. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
7
Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks.鸽群中的层级群体动力学。
Nature. 2010 Apr 8;464(7290):890-3. doi: 10.1038/nature08891.
8
Deciding group movements: where and when to go.决定群体行动:去往何处以及何时出发。
Behav Processes. 2010 Jul;84(3):675-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Mar 27.
9
Swarm intelligence in animals and humans.群体智能在动物和人类中的体现。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jan;25(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.016. Epub 2009 Sep 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验