Dublin City University Business School, Dublin, Ireland.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jun;55:256-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.022. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
This study examines the interactive relationship between three dimensions of safety climate (management commitment to safety, priority of safety, and pressure for production), and their impact on risk behavior reported by employees. The sample consisted of 623 employees from a chemical manufacturing organization in South Africa. Hierarchical regression analyses were carried out to test the direct effects and the interaction effect of the three safety climate dimensions on risk behavior. The results showed that, as expected, employees' risk behavior was negatively related to management commitment to safety and priority of safety and positively related to pressure for production. Moreover, as expected, the three-way interaction between management commitment to safety, priority of safety and pressure for production was significant. When pressure for production was high, management commitment to safety was negatively related to risk behavior, regardless of level of priority of safety on plant. When pressure for production was low, the effect of management commitment to safety on risk behavior was nullified under conditions of high, as compared to low priority of safety on plant. These findings highlight the importance of managerial commitment to safety in contexts where employees experience tensions between production deadlines and safety procedures.
本研究考察了安全氛围的三个维度(管理层对安全的承诺、安全的优先级以及生产压力)之间的相互关系,以及它们对员工报告的风险行为的影响。样本由南非一家化工制造组织的 623 名员工组成。采用分层回归分析检验了三个安全氛围维度对风险行为的直接影响和交互作用。结果表明,正如预期的那样,员工的风险行为与管理层对安全的承诺和安全的优先级呈负相关,而与生产压力呈正相关。此外,管理层对安全的承诺、安全的优先级和生产压力之间的三向交互作用是显著的。当生产压力较高时,管理层对安全的承诺与风险行为呈负相关,而不论工厂的安全优先级水平如何。当生产压力较低时,在工厂安全优先级较高和较低的情况下,管理层对安全的承诺对风险行为的影响均为零。这些发现强调了在员工面临生产截止日期和安全程序之间的紧张关系的情况下,管理层对安全的承诺的重要性。