Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Resuscitation. 2013 Sep;84(9):1208-13. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.03.028. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is important to survival after cardiac arrest. Mechanical devices (MD) provide constant CPR, but their effectiveness may be affected by deployment timeliness.
To identify the timeliness of the overall and of each essential step in the deployment of a piston-type MD during emergency department (ED) resuscitation, and to identify factors associated with delayed MD deployment by video recordings.
Between December 2005 and December 2008, video clips from resuscitations with CPR sessions using a MD in the ED were reviewed using time-motion analyses. The overall deployment timeliness and the time spent on each essential step of deployment were measured.
There were 37 CPR recordings that used a MD. Deployment of MD took an average 122.6 ± 57.8s. The 3 most time-consuming steps were: (1) setting the device (57.8 ± 38.3s), (2) positioning the patient (33.4 ± 38.0 s), and (3) positioning the device (14.7 ± 9.5s). Total no flow time was 89.1 ± 41.2s (72.7% of total time) and associated with the 3 most time-consuming steps. There was no difference in the total timeliness, no-flow time, and no-flow ratio between different rescuer numbers, time of day of the resuscitation, or body size of patients.
Rescuers spent a significant amount of time on MD deployment, leading to long no-flow times. Lack of familiarity with the device and positioning strategy were associated with poor performance. Additional training in device deployment strategies are required to improve the benefits of mechanical CPR.
心肺复苏(CPR)的质量对心脏骤停后的生存至关重要。机械装置(MD)提供持续的 CPR,但它们的效果可能会受到部署及时性的影响。
确定活塞式 MD 在急诊科(ED)复苏过程中的整体部署以及每个关键步骤的及时性,并通过视频记录确定与 MD 延迟部署相关的因素。
2005 年 12 月至 2008 年 12 月期间,使用时间动作分析对使用 MD 进行 CPR 期间的 ED 复苏视频剪辑进行了回顾。测量了整体部署的及时性和部署每个关键步骤所花费的时间。
共有 37 次 CPR 记录使用了 MD。MD 的部署平均需要 122.6±57.8s。用时最长的 3 个步骤是:(1)设置设备(57.8±38.3s),(2)定位患者(33.4±38.0 s),(3)定位设备(14.7±9.5s)。总无流时间为 89.1±41.2s(总时间的 72.7%),与用时最长的 3 个步骤相关。不同救援人员数量、复苏时间、患者体型之间的总及时性、无流时间和无流比例没有差异。
救援人员在 MD 部署上花费了大量时间,导致无流时间较长。对设备不熟悉和定位策略不当与表现不佳有关。需要对设备部署策略进行额外培训,以提高机械 CPR 的效果。