Suppr超能文献

从系统评价中制定护理质量指标:以医院分娩为例。

Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery.

机构信息

Service of Clinical Epidemiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), c/Sant Quintí 89, Barcelona, 08026, Spain.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2013 Apr 10;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-42.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this research is to generate quality of care indicators from systematic reviews to assess the appropriateness of obstetric care in hospitals.

METHODS

A search for systematic reviews about hospital obstetric interventions, conducted in The Cochrane Library, clinical evidence and practice guidelines, identified 303 reviews. We selected 48 high-quality evidence reviews, which resulted in strong clinical recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The 255 remaining reviews were excluded, mainly due to a lack of strong evidence provided by the studies reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 18 indicators were formulated from these clinical recommendations, on antepartum care (8), care during delivery and postpartum (9), and incomplete miscarriage (1). Authors of the systematic reviews and specialists in obstetrics were consulted to refine the formulation of indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality systematic reviews, whose conclusions clearly claim in favour or against an intervention, can be a source for generating quality indicators of delivery care. To make indicators coherent, the nuances of clinical practice should be considered. Any attempt made to evaluate the extent to which delivery care in hospitals is based on scientific evidence should take the generated indicators into account.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在从系统评价中生成护理质量指标,以评估医院产科护理的适宜性。

方法

在 Cochrane 图书馆、临床证据和实践指南中搜索关于医院产科干预的系统评价,共确定了 303 项评价。我们选择了 48 项高质量的证据评价,这些评价使用推荐评估、制定和评价(GRADE)系统得出了强有力的临床推荐。255 项剩余的评价被排除在外,主要是因为所审查的研究没有提供强有力的证据。

结果

从这些临床推荐中制定了 18 个指标,包括产前护理(8 个)、分娩期和产后护理(9 个)和不完全流产(1 个)。系统评价的作者和产科专家被咨询以完善指标的制定。

结论

高质量的系统评价,其结论明确支持或反对某项干预措施,可以成为生成分娩护理质量指标的来源。为了使指标具有一致性,应考虑临床实践的细微差别。任何试图评估医院分娩护理在多大程度上基于科学证据的尝试都应考虑生成的指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1957/3626798/49950e1ccb91/1748-5908-8-42-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验