Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India,
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Oct;288(4):873-82. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2843-7. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
We intended to assess the clinicopathological features and treatment outcome in patients of uterine sarcoma.
A retrospective review of medical records of patients of uterine sarcoma (2002-2007) was conducted. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Forty-two patients met the study criterion [15 carcinosarcoma, 12 endometrial stromal sarcoma, 11 leiomyosarcoma, 3 undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (UES), and 1 mixed sarcoma]. Median age and performance status were 52 years and ECOG 0, respectively. All patients underwent primary surgery out of which 66.7 % was total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. FIGO (2009) stage was I, II, III, IV and unknown in 66.7, 7.1, 14.3, 9.5, and 2.4 % of the patients. Eight patients were kept on follow-up only. Adjuvant radiation, chemoradiation, and chemotherapy were offered in 8, 9, and 3 patients, respectively. Pelvic radiation: 46 Gray/23 fractions/4.5 weeks and vincristine, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (VAC) regimen were most commonly used. Overall clinical complete response (CR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were, respectively, 59.5, 2.4, and 26.2 % (response not evaluable in 12 %). In the evaluable patients (N = 33), median OS was noted to be 7.67 months (mean 30.19 months). 1- and 2-year actuarial survival were 45.45 and 36.36 %. Stratified by histology, median survival in patients with carcinosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and UES were, respectively, 6.57, 18.7, 6.8, and 9.38 months. On univariate analysis, response to therapy (p = 0.0003), disease stage (p = 0.00001), tumor size (p = 0.02), and performance status (p = 0.03) were significant predictors of OS. Disease stage (p = 0.005) and response to therapy (p = 0.01) retained significance on multivariate analysis.
Median OS of only 6.57, 6.8, and 9.38 months, respectively, in patients with carcinosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and UES in our series reflect the aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis of these rare neoplasms, which mandate intensive multimodality therapy. Even in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, median survival of 18.7 months in our series is far from satisfying. However, small series, poor treatment compliance and socio-economic constraints in the Indian scenario are limiting factors in the result analysis.
评估子宫肉瘤患者的临床病理特征和治疗结局。
对 2002-2007 年子宫肉瘤患者的病历进行回顾性分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法分析总生存期(OS)。
符合研究标准的 42 例患者[15 例癌肉瘤、12 例子宫内膜间质肉瘤、11 例平滑肌肉瘤、3 例未分化子宫内膜肉瘤(UES)和 1 例混合肉瘤]。中位年龄和表现状态分别为 52 岁和 ECOG 0。所有患者均行初次手术,其中 66.7%为全子宫切除术和双侧附件切除术。FIGO(2009)分期为 I、II、III、IV 和未知的患者分别占 66.7%、7.1%、14.3%、9.5%和 2.4%。8 例患者仅接受随访。分别有 8 例、9 例和 3 例患者接受了辅助放疗、放化疗和化疗。盆腔放疗采用 46 戈瑞/23 次/4.5 周和长春新碱、阿霉素、环磷酰胺(VAC)方案,是最常用的方案。总体临床完全缓解(CR)、稳定疾病(SD)和进展疾病(PD)的比例分别为 59.5%、2.4%和 26.2%(12 例无法评估)。在可评估的患者(N=33)中,中位 OS 为 7.67 个月(平均 30.19 个月)。1 年和 2 年的生存率分别为 45.45%和 36.36%。按组织学分层,癌肉瘤、子宫内膜间质肉瘤、平滑肌肉瘤和 UES 患者的中位生存时间分别为 6.57、18.7、6.8 和 9.38 个月。单因素分析显示,治疗反应(p=0.0003)、疾病分期(p=0.00001)、肿瘤大小(p=0.02)和表现状态(p=0.03)是 OS 的显著预测因素。疾病分期(p=0.005)和治疗反应(p=0.01)在多因素分析中仍有意义。
本研究中,癌肉瘤、平滑肌肉瘤和 UES 患者的中位 OS 分别为 6.57、6.8 和 9.38 个月,反映了这些罕见肿瘤侵袭性的临床病程和不良预后,需要强化多模式治疗。即使在低级别子宫内膜间质肉瘤中,我们研究的中位生存时间 18.7 个月也远不理想。然而,印度的小样本、治疗依从性差和社会经济限制是结果分析的限制因素。