消除“十大讽刺规则”中的统计褶皱。
Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules".
机构信息
Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
出版信息
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:499-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
Abstract
The article "Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers" (Friston, 2012) shares some commonly heard frustrations about the peer-review process that all researchers can identify with. Though we found the article amusing, we have some concerns about its description of a number of statistical issues. In this commentary we address these issues, as well as the premise of the article.
摘要
文章《非统计评审员的十大讽刺规则》（Friston，2012）分享了一些关于同行评审过程中常见的不满，所有研究人员都能感同身受。虽然我们觉得这篇文章很有趣，但我们对其中描述的一些统计问题有些担忧。在这篇评论中，我们将讨论这些问题，以及文章的前提。
相似文献
1
Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules".
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:499-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
2
Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers.
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1300-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
3
Cross-validation and hypothesis testing in neuroimaging: An irenic comment on the exchange between Friston and Lindquist et al.
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 1;116:248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
4
Sample size and the fallacies of classical inference.
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:503-504. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.057. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
5
Why small low-powered studies are worse than large high-powered studies and how to protect against "trivial" findings in research: comment on Friston (2012).
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:496-498. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.030. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
6
Counterpoint: Statistical analysis in NIH peer review--identifying innovation.
FASEB J. 2007 Feb;21(2):309-10; discussion 311. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-0205ufm.
7
Point: Statistical analysis in NIH peer review--identifying innovation.
FASEB J. 2007 Feb;21(2):305-8. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-0204ufm.
8
Reporting statistical analyses in peer review journal articles.
Health Info Libr J. 2015 Jun;32(2):81-3. doi: 10.1111/hir.12106.
9
The peer-review process: caveat lector.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999 Apr-Jun;3(2):178-9. doi: 10.1080/10903129908958931.
10
Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers.
CMAJ. 1997 Nov 15;157(10):1442-6.
引用本文的文献
1
From Maps to Models: A Survey on the Reliability of Small Studies of Task-Based fMRI.
bioRxiv. 2024 Aug 7:2024.08.05.606611. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.05.606611.
2
Impact of sample size and regression of tissue-specific signals on effective connectivity within the core default mode network.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Dec 1;44(17):5858-5870. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26481. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
3
Testing the Magnitude of Correlations Across Experimental Conditions.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:860213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.860213. eCollection 2022.
4
Fronto-parietal homotopy in resting-state functional connectivity predicts task-switching performance.
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Mar;227(2):655-672. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02312-w. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
5
Influence of sample size and analytic approach on stability and interpretation of brain-behavior correlations in task-related fMRI data.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jan;42(1):204-219. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25217. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Autosomal Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease: Analysis of genetic subgroups by Machine Learning.
Inf Fusion. 2020 Jun;58:153-167. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
7
Sparse Sampling of Silence Type I Errors With an Emphasis on Primary Auditory Cortex.
Front Neurosci. 2019 May 31;13:516. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00516. eCollection 2019.
8
Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging.
Neuroimage. 2019 Jun;193:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.057. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
9
Neuroimaging of individual differences: A latent variable modeling perspective.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Mar;98:29-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
10
The impact of sample size on the reproducibility of voxel-based lesion-deficit mappings.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 1;115:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
本文引用的文献
1
Correlations and Multiple Comparisons in Functional Imaging: A Statistical Perspective (Commentary on Vul et al., 2009).
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):310-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01130.x.
2
Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers.
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1300-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
3
Cooperation between referees and authors increases peer review accuracy.
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026895. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
4
Everything you never wanted to know about circular analysis, but were afraid to ask.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010 Sep;30(9):1551-7. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.86. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
Zotero 插件