Shanghai Research Center for Acupuncture and Meridians, Shanghai 201203, China ; Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:149612. doi: 10.1155/2013/149612. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
The efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) on epilepsy remains to be verified because of previous controversies that might be due to the complexity of the effects induced by different acupoints and stimulation approaches adopted. Therefore, we investigated the effects of EA on epilepsy to determine the specific acupoints and optimal stimulation parameters in this work. Experimental epilepsy was induced by injecting kainic acid to the lateral cerebral ventricle of adult male SD rats. EA with a low-frequency (10 Hz/1 mA) or high-frequency (100 Hz/1 mA) current was applied to the epileptic model for 30 minutes starting at 0.5 hour after the injection. Four pairs of acupoints were tested, that is, Shuigou (DU26) + Dazhui (DU14), Jinsuo (DU8) + Yaoqi (EXB9), Neiguan (PC6) + Quchi (LI11), and Fenglong (ST40) + Yongquan (KI1). We found that (1) low- or high-frequency EA at different acupoints reduced epileptic seizures (P < 0.05 versus the control) with an exception of low-frequency EA at Neiguan (PC6) and Quchi (LI11); (2) low-frequency EA induced a better effect at Fenglong (ST40) plus Yongquan (KI1) than that of the other acupoints (P < 0.05); (3) there is no significant difference in the effects of high-frequency EA at these acupoints; and (4) the high-frequency EA elicited a greater effect than that of low-frequency EA in all groups (P < 0.05), with an exception at Jinsuo (DU8) + Yaoqi (EXB9). The EA-induced attenuation appeared 1-1.5 hours after EA with no appreciable effect in the first hour after EA in either the EEG or the behavioral tests. We conclude that EA attenuation of epileptic seizures is dependent on the stimulation parameters and acupoints and that the delay in appearance of the EA effect could be a reflection of the time required by the EA signal to regulate neural function in the central nervous system.
电针对癫痫的疗效仍需验证,因为之前的研究存在争议,这可能是由于不同穴位和刺激方法所产生的影响复杂所致。因此,我们在这项工作中研究了电针对癫痫的影响,以确定具体的穴位和最佳刺激参数。通过向成年雄性 SD 大鼠侧脑室内注射海人酸诱导癫痫发作。在注射后 0.5 小时开始,用低频(10 Hz/1 mA)或高频(100 Hz/1 mA)电流对癫痫模型进行 30 分钟的电针治疗。测试了四对穴位,即水沟(DU26)+大椎(DU14)、金锁(DU8)+腰奇(EXB9)、内关(PC6)+曲池(LI11)和丰隆(ST40)+涌泉(KI1)。我们发现:(1)不同穴位的低频或高频电针均能减少癫痫发作(与对照组相比,P<0.05),但内关(PC6)和曲池(LI11)的低频电针除外;(2)低频电针在丰隆(ST40)+涌泉(KI1)的效果优于其他穴位(P<0.05);(3)这些穴位的高频电针效果无显著差异;(4)所有组中高频电针的效果均优于低频电针(P<0.05),但金锁(DU8)+腰奇(EXB9)除外。电针诱发的抑制作用在电针后 1-1.5 小时出现,在 EEG 或行为测试中,电针后 1 小时内均无明显作用。我们得出结论,电针对癫痫发作的抑制作用取决于刺激参数和穴位,而电针效应出现的延迟可能反映了电针信号调节中枢神经系统神经功能所需的时间。