Burn Injury Research Unit, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia.
Burns. 2013 Sep;39(6):1162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
This study investigated demographic factors, experience of burn/care and first aid course attendance as factors influencing burn first aid knowledge.
A cross-sectional study was undertaken using convenience sampling of members of sporting and recreation clubs. The main outcome measure was the proportion of correct responses to multiple-choice questions relating to four burn scenarios: (1) scald, (2) contact burn, (3) ignited clothing, and (4) chemical burn.
A total of 2602 responses were obtained. Large gaps (30-50% incorrect answers) were identified in burn first aid knowledge across all scenarios. 15% more individuals gave correct answers if they had attended a first aid course compared to those who had not (p<0.0001); this proportion increased if the course was undertaken within the previous five years (p<0.0001) or contained a burns-specific component (p<0.0001). Males and younger (≤25 years) and older (≥65 years) age-groups had relatively lower levels of burn first aid knowledge. Gender and age were significant predictors of first aid course attendance, with males and younger (≤25 years) and older (≥65 years) age-groups less likely to have attended a first aid course.
In this sample, first aid training undertaken within the last 5 years with a specific burns component was associated with enhanced burn first aid knowledge.
本研究调查了人口统计学因素、烧伤/护理经验和急救课程参加情况,以了解这些因素对烧伤急救知识的影响。
采用便利抽样法对运动和娱乐俱乐部的成员进行了横断面研究。主要的结果测量是对与四个烧伤场景相关的多项选择题的正确答案比例:(1)烫伤,(2)接触烧伤,(3)点燃的衣物,和(4)化学烧伤。
共获得 2602 份回复。在所有场景中,烧伤急救知识都存在很大的差距(30-50%的错误答案)。与未参加过急救课程的人相比,如果参加过急救课程,正确答案的比例增加了 15%(p<0.0001);如果课程是在过去五年内进行的(p<0.0001)或包含烧伤特定内容(p<0.0001),则这一比例会进一步增加。男性和年轻(≤25 岁)和年长(≥65 岁)年龄组的烧伤急救知识水平相对较低。性别和年龄是急救课程参加的重要预测因素,男性和年轻(≤25 岁)和年长(≥65 岁)年龄组参加急救课程的可能性较小。
在本样本中,最近 5 年内参加过有特定烧伤内容的急救培训与烧伤急救知识的提高有关。