Suppr超能文献

临床试验资格筛选所需的努力。

Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials.

机构信息

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov;8(6):365-70. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000646. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Determining eligibility for a clinical trial (CT) typically requires a lengthy manual review of data for a single evaluation. The cost associated with eligibility screening is typically not compensated through contracts supporting CTs.

METHODS

We used a real-time tracking system that captures CT evaluations and provides information on evaluation outcomes and time spent on each eligibility screening by research staff. Using these data, we describe the effort and costs of eligibility screening overall and per enrolled patient for cancer CTs. The study sample included all completed eligibility assessment (evaluation) records for the 18-month study period. We used generalized multinomial modeling to predict evaluation outcomes and then used the resulting parameter coefficients to estimate the effort associated with each participant, adjusted for probability of being enrolled. From these data, we calculated cost associated with eligibility screening.

RESULTS

We found substantial variation in attributed cost by study type and phase. The cost of eligibility screening ranged by study phase from $129.15 to $336.48 per enrolled patient. The estimated annual cost of screening was more than $90,000.

CONCLUSION

This study provides results based on prospectively captured effort to estimate the largely nonreimbursed costs of eligibility screening and suggests that screening can be a significant financial burden to an institution. Centers performing CTs may need to acknowledge the differences in screening costs for different study types when negotiating contracts with funding organizations. Information such as that captured here could support such negotiations to reduce the gap between reimbursed and nonreimbursed costs.

摘要

目的

确定临床试验 (CT) 的资格通常需要对单个评估进行冗长的手动数据审查。与资格筛选相关的成本通常无法通过支持 CT 的合同得到补偿。

方法

我们使用了一个实时跟踪系统,该系统可捕获 CT 评估,并提供有关评估结果和研究人员在每个资格筛选上花费的时间的信息。使用这些数据,我们总体描述了资格筛选的工作量和成本,以及每位入组患者的成本。研究样本包括研究期间所有完成的资格评估(评估)记录。我们使用广义多项模型来预测评估结果,然后使用所得参数系数来估计与每个参与者相关的工作量,同时考虑了入组的可能性。根据这些数据,我们计算了与资格筛选相关的成本。

结果

我们发现研究类型和阶段对归因成本有很大的影响。每个入组患者的资格筛选成本从研究阶段的 129.15 美元到 336.48 美元不等。预计每年的筛选成本超过 90,000 美元。

结论

本研究基于前瞻性捕获的努力提供了结果,以估计资格筛选的大部分未报销成本,并表明筛选可能对机构造成重大财务负担。进行 CT 的中心在与资助组织协商合同时,可能需要承认不同研究类型的筛选成本差异。类似这里捕获的信息可以支持此类谈判,以缩小报销和未报销成本之间的差距。

相似文献

1
Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials.
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov;8(6):365-70. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000646. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
5
6
Validity versus generalizability in clinical trial design and conduct.
J Card Fail. 1998 Sep;4(3):239-41. doi: 10.1016/s1071-9164(98)80014-6.
7
An optimal rule for screening subjects for clinical trials in the presence of within-person variability.
Control Clin Trials. 1994 Jun;15(3):173-86. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90055-8.
8
Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: measuring efficiency and flexibility.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 May;31(3):207-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
10
Textual inference for eligibility criteria resolution in clinical trials.
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Dec;58 Suppl(Suppl):S211-S218. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

3
Clinical researchers' insights on key data for eligibility screening in clinical studies.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 16;8(1):e167. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.617. eCollection 2024.
4
Utilizing Large Language Models for Enhanced Clinical Trial Matching: A Study on Automation in Patient Screening.
Cureus. 2024 May 10;16(5):e60044. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60044. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Distilling large language models for matching patients to clinical trials.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 1;31(9):1953-1963. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae073.
7
Named Entity Recognition and Normalization for Alzheimer's Disease Eligibility Criteria.
Proc (IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform). 2023 Jun;2023:558-564. doi: 10.1109/ichi57859.2023.00100. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
8
Matching Patients to Accelerate Clinical Trials (MPACT): Enabling Technology for Oncology Clinical Trial Workflow.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:1086-1090. doi: 10.3233/SHTI231132.
9
OncoCTMiner: streamlining precision oncology trial matching via molecular profile analysis.
Database (Oxford). 2023 Nov 4;2023. doi: 10.1093/database/baad077.
10
Uncovering key clinical trial features influencing recruitment.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Sep 4;7(1):e199. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.623. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to recruitment of rural patients in cancer clinical trials.
J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3):172-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000158.
2
Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial.
Clin Trials. 2011 Apr;8(2):214-23. doi: 10.1177/1740774510396742. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
3
Prospective evaluation of two recruitment strategies for a randomized controlled cancer prevention trial.
Clin Trials. 2010 Dec;7(6):744-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774510383886. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
4
Effective and cost-effective clinical trial recruitment strategies for postmenopausal women in a community-based, primary care setting.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Sep;31(5):447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
5
Cancer clinical trials--a chronic but curable crisis.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):306-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1005843. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
6
Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: measuring efficiency and flexibility.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 May;31(3):207-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
9
Recruiting minorities where they receive care: Institutional barriers to cancer clinical trials recruitment in a safety-net hospital.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Nov;30(6):552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Jul 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验