Parker Malcolm
University of Queensland.
J Law Med. 2013 Mar;20(3):512-27.
In the context of the current Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee Inquiry entitled "The Involuntary or Coerced Sterilisation of People with Disabilities in Australia" this column considers the history of judicial decisions and associated reports and articles concerning the issues raised by sterilisation and menstrual management for intellectually disabled women and girls in Australia. It is by no means an exhaustive coverage, but it critically analyses a number of concepts and arguments, including terminological questions, models of disability, conceptualisations of human and reproductive rights, definitions of last resort treatment, usage of the therapeutic/non-therapeutic distinction, ideas about eugenics, and the contested notion of best interests, among others. It is intended as a critical, conceptual contribution to the current debates concerning "forced sterilisation".
在当前参议院社区事务参考委员会题为“澳大利亚残疾人的非自愿或强制绝育”的调查背景下,本专栏探讨了澳大利亚智障妇女和女孩绝育及经期管理问题所引发的司法判决历史以及相关报告和文章。这绝非详尽无遗的涵盖,但它批判性地分析了一些概念和论点,包括术语问题、残疾模式、人权与生殖权利的概念化、最后手段治疗的定义、治疗性/非治疗性区分的使用、优生学观念以及最佳利益这一有争议的概念等等。其目的是对当前关于“强制绝育”的辩论作出批判性的概念性贡献。