Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK. john.stevens@sheffi eld.ac.uk
Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):500-6. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.776180. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
This study set out to determine the accuracy with which tone pip ABR and click ABR, carried out in babies referred from universal newborn hearing screening, is able to predict the hearing outcome as determined by follow-up hearing tests.
The cohort of babies studied were all babies referred for hearing assessment from the universal newborn hearing screen in Sheffield, UK for the period January 2002 to September 2007, who were found to have a significant hearing impairment.
The results of hearing assessment following referral from the newborn hearing screen were collected together with those of follow-up tests carried out up to an age when behavioural testing had established ear- and frequency-specific thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz.
The standard deviation of the difference between the follow up and the tone pip ABR thresholds was 10.5 dB for the 4-kHz tone pip, 16.8 dB for the 1-kHz tone pip, and ranged between 21.7 and 24.7 dB for click ABR.
The results of the study show that tone pip ABR following referral from newborn hearing screening has a similar accuracy to that reported in older subjects, and is a much better predictor compared to click ABR.
本研究旨在确定从新生儿普遍听力筛查中转诊的婴儿进行的音调峰 ABR 和 click ABR 的准确性,以预测随访听力测试确定的听力结果。
本研究的婴儿队列均为英国谢菲尔德新生儿普遍听力筛查转诊的婴儿,这些婴儿被发现有明显的听力障碍。
收集了从新生儿听力筛查转诊后的听力评估结果,以及在行为测试确定了 0.5、1、2 和 4 kHz 时的耳和频率特异性阈值的随访测试结果。
4 kHz 音调峰 ABR 和 1 kHz 音调峰 ABR 的随访和音调峰 ABR 阈值之间的差异标准差分别为 10.5 dB 和 16.8 dB,click ABR 的范围在 21.7 至 24.7 dB 之间。
研究结果表明,从新生儿听力筛查中转诊后的音调峰 ABR 具有与在年龄较大的受试者中报告的相似的准确性,并且与 click ABR 相比,它是一个更好的预测指标。