Providence Medical Research Center, Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Children's Hospital, Spokane, Washington; , †Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington;, ‡Division of Nephrology and , ¶Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, §College of Nursing and , ‖College of Pharmacy, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Oct;8(10):1829-38. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00130113. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
Strategies to effectively treat people with CKD have been identified by conventional clinical research. Despite this evidence, awareness, screening, detection, diagnosis, risk factor control, treatment, and outcomes remain substandard. Translating clinical evidence into actionable measures that reduce the burden of CKD is a pressing need. Expansion from a "bench-to-bedside" paradigm (conventional type 1 translation) to research that encompasses "clinic and community" is the core concept of type 2 translation. Specifically, this is the discipline of identifying factors and using strategies that lead to adoption, maintenance, and sustainability of science-based interventions in practice. This review identifies key elements of type 2 translational research and highlights the current scope of this type of research for CKD. For type 2 translation to achieve the goals of providing high-quality care and better health outcomes, key facilitators (e.g., theory-based frameworks, adaptable interventions, and inclusion of sustainability and evaluation metrics) and essential elements (e.g., multidisciplinary team care, health information technology, and stakeholder engagement) must be integrated. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases recently funded five proposals that aim to improve outcomes for people with CKD, focusing on diverse components of the healthcare continuum: patient safety and transitions; delivery of high-quality, evidence-based CKD care; and elimination of disparities. The need for type 2 translational research in CKD is urgent because of preventable human suffering and unsustainable costs of providing care. Focus on the theory, framework, and approaches we have suggested may help us meet that challenge.
已经确定了通过常规临床研究有效治疗 CKD 患者的策略。尽管有这些证据,但意识、筛查、检测、诊断、危险因素控制、治疗和结果仍然不达标。将临床证据转化为可采取行动的措施以减轻 CKD 负担是当务之急。从“从实验室到病床”的模式(传统的 1 型转化)扩展到包含“诊所和社区”的研究是 2 型转化的核心概念。具体来说,这是确定导致基于科学的干预措施在实践中得到采用、维持和可持续性的因素和策略的学科。这篇综述确定了 2 型转化研究的关键要素,并强调了目前这种研究类型在 CKD 中的范围。为了使 2 型转化实现提供高质量护理和改善健康结果的目标,必须整合关键促进因素(例如,基于理论的框架、可适应的干预措施以及包含可持续性和评估指标)和基本要素(例如,多学科团队护理、健康信息技术和利益相关者参与)。美国国立糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所最近资助了五个旨在改善 CKD 患者预后的提案,这些提案侧重于医疗保健连续体的不同组成部分:患者安全和过渡;提供高质量、基于证据的 CKD 护理;以及消除差异。由于提供护理的人力痛苦和成本不可持续,因此 CKD 迫切需要 2 型转化研究。关注我们所建议的理论、框架和方法可能有助于我们应对这一挑战。