Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Aug;92(8):943-50. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12159. Epub 2013 May 29.
Evaluating the validity of pre-eclampsia registration in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) according to both broader and restricted disease definitions.
Retrospective nested cohort study.
Multicenter study.
In this study, two cohorts of women with pre-eclamptic pregnancies registered in the MBRN were selected. Study group 1 contained 966 pregnancies from 1967 to 2002. Concomitant participation in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2 was required. Study group 2 comprised 1138 pregnancies recorded in 1967-2005, examined as a pre-eclampsia biobank was established.
Diagnostic criteria vary. The broader criteria for pre-eclampsia, used by the MBRN, are one measurement of hypertension and proteinuria (Criterion A). Criteria used internationally today require two measurements of hypertension and proteinuria (Criterion B). The diagnostic validities in Study groups 1 and 2 were judged against medical records according to Criterion A and B, respectively.
Positive predictive value (PPV) and trend analyses.
The diagnosis was confirmed in 88.3% of pregnancies in Study group 1, and in 63.6% in Study group 2. PPV was high for Study group 1 throughout the period. For Study group 2, results improved significantly after 1986.
This study ascertains high PPV of pre-eclampsia in the MBRN using broader traditional criteria, although the PPV decreases through assessment using restricted modern criteria. This illustrates how inclusion of direct measurements may improve registration of complex disorders defined by changing diagnostic criteria.
根据更广泛和更严格的疾病定义,评估挪威医学出生登记处(MBRN)中先兆子痫登记的有效性。
回顾性嵌套队列研究。
多中心研究。
本研究选择了在 MBRN 中登记的先兆子痫妊娠的两个队列的妇女。研究组 1 包含 1967 年至 2002 年的 966 例妊娠。需要同时参加北特伦德拉格健康研究 2。研究组 2 由 1967-2005 年记录的 1138 例妊娠组成,当时建立了一个先兆子痫生物库进行检查。
诊断标准不同。MBRN 使用的更广泛的先兆子痫标准是一次高血压和蛋白尿测量(标准 A)。今天国际上使用的标准需要两次高血压和蛋白尿测量(标准 B)。根据标准 A 和 B,分别根据病历对研究组 1 和 2 的诊断有效性进行了判断。
阳性预测值(PPV)和趋势分析。
研究组 1 中 88.3%的妊娠得到了确认,研究组 2 中 63.6%的妊娠得到了确认。研究组 1 在整个期间的 PPV 较高。对于研究组 2,1986 年后结果显著改善。
本研究使用更广泛的传统标准确定了 MBRN 中先兆子痫的高 PPV,尽管使用更严格的现代标准评估时 PPV 降低。这表明,通过纳入直接测量,如何改善复杂疾病的登记,这些疾病的诊断标准正在发生变化。