Meltzer Andrew C, Baumann Brigitte M, Chen Esther H, Shofer Frances S, Mills Angela M
Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;62(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.01.021. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
A clinical decision rule that identifies patients at low risk for appendicitis may reduce the reliance on computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis. We seek to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of a low modified Alvarado score in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected appendicitis and compare the score to clinical judgment. We hypothesize that a low modified Alvarado score will have a sufficiently high sensitivity to rule out acute appendicitis.
We performed a prospective observational study of adult patients with suspected appendicitis at 2 academic urban EDs. A low modified Alvarado score was defined as less than 4. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) for a low modified Alvarado score, and a final diagnosis of appendicitis was confirmed by CT, laparotomy, or 7-day follow-up.
Two hundred sixty-one patients were included for analysis (mean age 35 years [range 18 to 89 years], 68% female patients, 52% white). Fifty-three patients (20%) had acute appendicitis. The modified Alvarado score test characteristics demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 72% (95% CI 58% to 84%) and 54% (95% CI 47% to 61%), respectively. Unstructured clinical judgment that appendicitis was either the most likely or second most likely diagnosis demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 93% (95% CI 82% to 98%) and 33% (95% CI 27% to 40%), respectively.
With a sensitivity of 72%, a low modified Alvarado score is less sensitive than clinical judgment in excluding acute appendicitis.
一种能够识别阑尾炎低风险患者的临床决策规则,可能会减少对计算机断层扫描(CT)诊断的依赖。我们旨在前瞻性地评估改良阿瓦拉多低评分在疑似阑尾炎的急诊科(ED)患者中的准确性,并将该评分与临床判断进行比较。我们假设改良阿瓦拉多低评分将具有足够高的敏感性以排除急性阑尾炎。
我们对两家学术性城市急诊科中疑似阑尾炎的成年患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。改良阿瓦拉多低评分定义为小于4分。计算改良阿瓦拉多低评分的敏感性和特异性,并给出95%置信区间(CI),阑尾炎的最终诊断通过CT、剖腹手术或7天随访得以证实。
纳入261例患者进行分析(平均年龄35岁[范围18至89岁],68%为女性患者,52%为白人)。53例患者(20%)患有急性阑尾炎。改良阿瓦拉多评分测试特征显示敏感性和特异性分别为72%(95%CI 58%至84%)和54%(95%CI 47%至61%)。非结构化临床判断认为阑尾炎是最可能或第二可能的诊断,其敏感性和特异性分别为93%(95%CI 82%至98%)和33%(95%CI 27%至40%)。
改良阿瓦拉多低评分的敏感性为72%,在排除急性阑尾炎方面不如临床判断敏感。