Nedeljković Marko, Bouzas-Ammann Gabrielle, Zimmermann Lukas, Stute Petra, Ausfeld-Hafter Brigitte
Universität Bern, Kollegiale Instanz für Komplementärmedizin KIKOM, Bern, Schweiz.
Forsch Komplementmed. 2013;20(2):112-8. doi: 10.1159/000350717. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
One in 5 couples is affected by infertility. To increase the effectiveness of assisted reproductive technology (ART) adjuvant acupuncture treatments are frequently administered. However, little is known about acupuncture treatment modalities employed in fertility centers. The aim of our study was to assess modalities of acupuncture treatments in fertility centers and compare them with investigated acupuncture treatments in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to ART.
Referring to fertility centers listed on the websites of the Swiss, German, and Austrian national fertility associations, 180 centers were invited to participate in an online survey assessing the provision of acupuncture in ART. Survey results were compared with data from 17 RCTs.
Acupuncture was offered by 33 (38.4%) of all responding fertility centers (n = 86; responder rate = 47.8%). In 39.4% the selection of acupuncture points is standardized or semi-standardized (24.2%) and in 27.3% based on individual TCM-diagnosis. Body acupuncture using needle stimulation was mentioned most frequently (84.8%). Some clinics reported additional use of auricular acupuncture (24.2%) and moxibustion (21.2%). Treatment providers were mainly physician-acupuncturists (84.8%). Compared to the RCTs, we found strong differences in point selection, mode of stimulation, and professional background of treatment providers.
Less than 40% of all fertility centres in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria offering acupuncture employ standardized acupuncture treatment protocols. To increase external validity of acupuncture research in ART, and to investigate clinical effectiveness of this adjuvant intervention, semi-standardized and individualized point selection should be considered, and treatment provision by non-acupuncturists should be omitted in future trials.
五分之一的夫妇受到不孕不育问题的影响。为提高辅助生殖技术(ART)的有效性,常常会采用辅助针灸治疗。然而,人们对生育中心所采用的针灸治疗方式知之甚少。我们研究的目的是评估生育中心的针灸治疗方式,并将其与ART相关随机对照试验(RCT)中所研究的针灸治疗进行比较。
参考瑞士、德国和奥地利国家生育协会网站上列出的生育中心,邀请180个中心参与一项在线调查,评估ART中针灸治疗的提供情况。将调查结果与17项RCT的数据进行比较。
所有回复的生育中心(n = 86;回复率 = 47.8%)中有33个(38.4%)提供针灸治疗。在39.4%的中心,穴位选择是标准化或半标准化的(24.2%),在27.3%的中心是基于个体中医诊断。最常提到的是使用针刺刺激的体针疗法(84.8%)。一些诊所报告还额外使用耳针疗法(24.2%)和艾灸(21.2%)。治疗提供者主要是医师针灸师(84.8%)。与RCT相比,我们发现在穴位选择、刺激方式和治疗提供者的专业背景方面存在很大差异。
瑞士、德国和奥地利所有提供针灸治疗的生育中心中,不到40%采用标准化的针灸治疗方案。为提高ART中针灸研究的外部效度,并研究这种辅助干预的临床有效性,应考虑半标准化和个体化的穴位选择,并且在未来的试验中应排除非针灸师提供治疗的情况。