a Department of Psychology , The Catholic University of America , Washington , DC , USA.
Cogn Emot. 2013;27(8):1460-8. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.789792. Epub 2013 May 7.
We examined mother-child co-operative behaviour, children's emotion regulation and executive function, as well as combinations of these factors, as predictors of moral reasoning in 89 10-year-old children. Dyadic co-operation was coded from videotaped observations of laboratory puzzle and speech tasks. Emotion regulation was derived from maternal report, and executive functioning was assessed with the Tower of London task. Moral reasoning was coded during mother-child conversations about morally ambiguous, peer-conflict situations. Two significant interactions indicated that children from more co-operative dyads who also had higher executive function skills had higher moral reasoning scores than other children, and children lower in both emotion regulation and executive function had lower moral reasoning scores than other children. The results contribute to the literature on the multiple and interactive levels of influence on moral reasoning in childhood.
我们考察了母亲-儿童合作行为、儿童情绪调节和执行功能,以及这些因素的组合,作为 89 名 10 岁儿童道德推理的预测因素。在实验室拼图和演讲任务的视频观察中对二元合作进行了编码。情绪调节来自母亲报告,执行功能通过伦敦塔任务进行评估。在关于道德模糊、同伴冲突情况的母子对话中对道德推理进行了编码。两个显著的相互作用表明,来自合作程度更高的二元组的儿童,如果他们的执行功能技能也更高,那么他们的道德推理得分会比其他儿童更高,而在情绪调节和执行功能方面都较低的儿童,其道德推理得分会比其他儿童更低。研究结果丰富了有关儿童道德推理的多层次和相互作用影响的文献。