University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Internal Medicine, Martinistr, 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2013 May 9;13:67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-67.
History taking and empathetic communication are two important aspects in successful physician-patient interaction. Gathering important information from the patient's medical history is needed for effective clinical decision making while empathy is relevant for patient satisfaction. We wanted to investigate whether medical students near graduation are able to combine both skills as required in daily medical practice.
Thirty near graduates from Hamburg Medical School participated in an assessment for clinical competences including a consultation hour with five standardized patients. Each patient interview was videotaped and standardized patients rated participants with the CARE questionnaire for consultation and relational empathy. All videotaped interviews were rated with a checklist based on the number of important medical aspects for each case. Data were analysed with the linear mixed model to correct for random effects. Regression analysis was performed to look for correlations between the number of questions asked by a participant and their respective empathy rating.
Of the 123 aspects that could have been gathered in total, students only requested 56.4% (95% CI 53.5-59.3). While no difference between male and female participants was found, a significant difference (p<.001) was observed between the two parts of the checklist with 61.1% (95% CI 57.9-64.3) of aspects asked for in part 1 (patient's symptoms) versus 52.0 (95 47.4-56.7) in part 2 (further history). All female standardized patients combined rated female participants (mean score 14.2, 95% CI 12.3-16.3) to be significantly (p<.01) more empathetic than male participants (mean score 19.2, 95% CI 16.3-22.6). Regression analysis revealed no correlation between the number of medical aspects gathered by a participant and his or her respective empathy score given by the standardized patient in the CARE questionnaire.
Gathering sufficient medical data from a patient's history and empathetic communication are two completely separate sides of the coin of history taking. While both skills have to be acquired during medical school training with particular focus on their respective learning objectives, medical students need to be provided with additional learning and feedback opportunities where they can be observed exercising both skills combined as required in physicians' daily practice.
病史采集和同理心沟通是成功医患互动的两个重要方面。从患者的病史中收集重要信息是做出有效临床决策的需要,而同理心则与患者满意度相关。我们想调查即将毕业的医学生是否能够结合日常医疗实践所需的这两项技能。
汉堡医科大学的 30 名即将毕业的学生参加了一项临床能力评估,包括与 5 名标准化患者进行咨询小时。每位患者访谈都进行了录像,标准化患者使用咨询和关系同理心 CARE 问卷对参与者进行评分。所有录像访谈都根据每个病例的重要医疗方面数量进行了基于检查表的评分。使用线性混合模型进行数据分析,以纠正随机效应。进行回归分析以寻找参与者提出的问题数量与其各自同理心评分之间的相关性。
在总共可以收集的 123 个方面中,学生仅要求了 56.4%(95%CI 53.5-59.3)。虽然未发现男女性参与者之间存在差异,但在检查表的两部分之间观察到显著差异(p<.001),第一部分(患者症状)中询问的方面占 61.1%(95%CI 57.9-64.3),而第二部分(进一步病史)中询问的方面占 52.0%(95%CI 47.4-56.7)。所有女性标准化患者对女性参与者的评分(平均得分 14.2,95%CI 12.3-16.3)均显著(p<.01)高于男性参与者(平均得分 19.2,95%CI 16.3-22.6)。回归分析显示,参与者收集的医学方面数量与标准化患者在 CARE 问卷中给出的相应同理心评分之间没有相关性。
从患者病史中收集足够的医疗数据和同理心沟通是病史采集的两个完全不同的方面。虽然这两项技能都需要在医学院培训中获得,特别注重各自的学习目标,但需要为医学生提供额外的学习和反馈机会,让他们能够观察到在日常实践中需要结合这两项技能。